These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12830603)

  • 21. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Neervoort F; Oude Rengerink K; van Baaren GJ; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf I; van Pampus MG; Franssen M; Oudijk M; van der Salm P; Woiski M; Pernet PJ; Feitsma AH; van Vliet H; Porath M; Roumen F; van Beek E; Versendaal H; Heres M; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Mar; 13():67. PubMed ID: 23506128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
    Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing induction of labour with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter at term: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled multi-centre non-inferiority trial.
    Ten Eikelder M; van Baaren GJ; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; Kleiverda G; Evers I; de Boer K; Brons J; Bloemenkamp K; Mol BW
    BJOG; 2018 Feb; 125(3):375-383. PubMed ID: 28440898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
    Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Goffinet F; Durand-Zaleski I; Ville Y; Vayssiere C; Roberto A; Lahna Z; Nisand I; Fisch C; Chaumet-Riffaud P; Chastang C
    BJOG; 2001 Dec; 108(12):1255-62. PubMed ID: 11843388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.
    Bracken H; Mundle S; Faragher B; Easterling T; Haycox A; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Sep; 14():308. PubMed ID: 25193157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
    Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Mundle S; Bracken H; Khedikar V; Mulik J; Faragher B; Easterling T; Leigh S; Granby P; Haycox A; Turner MA; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks AD
    Lancet; 2017 Aug; 390(10095):669-680. PubMed ID: 28668289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Titrated oral misoprostol solution--a new method of labour induction.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Matonhodze BB; Alfirevic Z; Campbell E; de Jager M; Nikodem C
    S Afr Med J; 2001 Sep; 91(9):775-6. PubMed ID: 11680329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor].
    Girault A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Misoprostol vaginal insert and Foley catheter in labour induction - single center retrospective observational study of obstetrical outcome.
    Mlodawski J; Mlodawska M; Plusajska J; Galuszewska J; Glijer K; Gluszek S
    Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(11):700-703. PubMed ID: 33301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.
    Lapuente-Ocamica O; Ugarte L; Lopez-Picado A; Sanchez-Refoyo F; Lasa IL; Echevarria O; Álvarez-Sala J; Fariñas A; Bilbao I; Barbero L; Vicarregui J; Hernanz Chaves R; Paz Corral D; Lopez-Lopez JA
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30621614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy of dinoprostone, intracervical foleys and misoprostol in labor induction.
    Saleem S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2006 Apr; 16(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 16624192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.