166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12830995)
1. Statistical hypothesis testing--how exact are exact p-values?
Gasko R
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2003; 104(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 12830995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The uncertainties of statistical "significance"].
Domenech RJ
Rev Med Chil; 2018 Dec; 146(10):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 30724983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization.
Sim J; Reid N
Phys Ther; 1999 Feb; 79(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 10029058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistics review 3: hypothesis testing and P values.
Whitley E; Ball J
Crit Care; 2002 Jun; 6(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 12133182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use and abuse of hypothesis tests: how to present P values.
Smith CJ; Fox ZV
Phlebology; 2010 Jun; 25(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 20483859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biostatistics Series Module 2: Overview of Hypothesis Testing.
Hazra A; Gogtay N
Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 27057011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
Ludbrook J
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects on scale and confidence intervals as alternatives to p < 0.05].
Wierdsma AI; van Os J
Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2013; 55(7):471-80. PubMed ID: 23868761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A note on consistency of non-parametric rank tests and related rank transformations.
Zimmerman DW
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 21518333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-tailed significance tests for 2 × 2 contingency tables: What is the alternative?
Prescott RJ
Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4264-4269. PubMed ID: 31264237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should we use one-sided or two-sided P values in tests of significance?
Ludbrook J
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Jun; 40(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 23551169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance. Part II. The use and interpretation of confidence intervals.
Luus HG; Müller FO; Meyer BH
S Afr Med J; 1989 Dec; 76(11):626-9. PubMed ID: 2595492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferences on the mean of zero-inflated lognormal data: the generalized variable approach.
Tian L
Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(20):3223-32. PubMed ID: 16189811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EDISON-WMW: Exact Dynamic Programing Solution of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
Marx A; Backes C; Meese E; Lenhof HP; Keller A
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 14(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 26829645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing.
Stolar MH
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Nov; 37(11):1539-45. PubMed ID: 7211860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
