These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12831050)

  • 1. Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling.
    Huijbregts MA; Gilijamse W; Ragas AM; Reijnders L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Jun; 37(11):2600-8. PubMed ID: 12831050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method.
    Lo SC; Ma HW; Lo SL
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Mar; 340(1-3):23-33. PubMed ID: 15752490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty in multi-media fate and transport models: a case study for TNT life cycle assessment.
    Mayo M; Collier ZA; Hoang V; Chappell M
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():104-12. PubMed ID: 25037048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scenario-model-parameter: a new method of cumulative risk uncertainty analysis.
    Moschandrea DJ; Karuchit S
    Environ Int; 2002 Sep; 28(4):247-61. PubMed ID: 12220111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part II: assessing parameter uncertainty and human variability in the calculation of toxicity potentials.
    Huijbregts MA; Thissen U; Jager T; van de Meent D; Ragas AM
    Chemosphere; 2000 Aug; 41(4):575-88. PubMed ID: 10819226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative sensitivity value (RSV): A metric for measuring input parameter influence in life cycle assessment modeling.
    Bhatt A; Abbassi B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2023 Mar; 19(2):547-555. PubMed ID: 36254872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial variability and uncertainty in ecological risk assessment: a case study on the potential risk of cadmium for the little owl in a Dutch river flood plain.
    Kooistra L; Huijbregts MA; Ragas AM; Wehrens R; Leuven RS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 39(7):2177-87. PubMed ID: 15871253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative life cycle environmental assessment between electric taxi and gasoline taxi in Beijing].
    Shi XQ; Sun ZX; Li XN; Li JX; Yang JX
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1105-16. PubMed ID: 25929083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life cycle analysis of pistachio production in Greece.
    Bartzas G; Komnitsas K
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Oct; 595():13-24. PubMed ID: 28376424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments.
    Wei W; Larrey-Lassalle P; Faure T; Dumoulin N; Roux P; Mathias JD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(5):2272-80. PubMed ID: 26815724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indoor exposure to toluene from printed matter matters: complementary views from life cycle assessment and risk assessment.
    Walser T; Juraske R; Demou E; Hellweg S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(1):689-97. PubMed ID: 24283298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying the trade-off between parameter and model structure uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment.
    van Zelm R; Huijbregts MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Aug; 47(16):9274-80. PubMed ID: 23879394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental characteristics comparison of Li-ion batteries and Ni-MH batteries under the uncertainty of cycle performance.
    Yu Y; Wang X; Wang D; Huang K; Wang L; Bao L; Wu F
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 229-230():455-60. PubMed ID: 22763226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life cycle assessment of rice production systems in different paddy field size levels in north of Iran.
    Habibi E; Niknejad Y; Fallah H; Dastan S; Tari DB
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Mar; 191(4):202. PubMed ID: 30826990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems.
    Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3130-43. PubMed ID: 26115299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination.
    Chen YC; Ma HW
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16926066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of stochastic approach based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for life cycle inventory (LCI) to the steel process chain: case study.
    Bieda B
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():649-55. PubMed ID: 24290145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment.
    Cucurachi S; Borgonovo E; Heijungs R
    Risk Anal; 2016 Feb; 36(2):357-77. PubMed ID: 26595377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management options using life cycle assessment: a case study.
    Yadav P; Samadder SR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(1):838-854. PubMed ID: 29063409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Methodology for Robust Comparative Life Cycle Assessments Incorporating Uncertainty.
    Gregory JR; Noshadravan A; Olivetti EA; Kirchain RE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jun; 50(12):6397-405. PubMed ID: 27219285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.