These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12831211)
1. Soft tissue changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated using Twin Block appliances: finite-element scaling analysis. Singh GD; Clark WJ Eur J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 25(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 12831211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Localization of mandibular changes in patients with class II division 1 malocclusions treated with twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis. Singh GD; Clark WJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11298315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphospatial analysis of soft-tissue profile in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using twin block appliances: geometric morphometrics. Singh GD Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Feb; 5(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 12071373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of the headgear-activator Teuscher appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a geometric morphometric study. Singh GD; Thind BS Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 May; 6(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 12809270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite-element morphometry of soft tissue morphology in subjects with untreated Class III malocclusions. Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 10371426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite-element morphometry of soft tissues in prepubertal Korean and European-Americans with Class III malocclusions. Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S Arch Oral Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 10391501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft tissue facial changes using Biobloc appliances: geometric morphometrics. Singh D; Medina LE; Hang WM Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 19739499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with Angle's Class III malocclusions. Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1997; 17(3):112-20. PubMed ID: 9338854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques. Battagel JM Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bimaxillary morphometry of patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with twin block appliances. Singh GD; Hodge MR Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):402-9. PubMed ID: 12401048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular morphology in subjects with Class III malocclusions: Finite-element morphometry. Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 9770098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midfacial morphology of Koreans with class III malocclusions investigated with finite-element scaling analysis. Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 2000; 20(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 10879653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Pancherz H; Anehus-Pancherz M Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 7957652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mandibular morphology in Korean and European-American children with Class III malocclusions using finite-element morphometry. Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 27(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 10867069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions. Binda SK; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maertens JK; van 't Hof MA Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 7957655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Baysal A; Uysal T Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 21357655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes. Sharma AA; Lee RT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study. Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Components of soft tissue deformations in subjects with untreated angle's Class III malocclusions: thin-plate spline analysis. Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1998; 18(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 10100051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]