121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12832574)
1. Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row CT: influence of heart rate and measurement methods on interacquisition variability initial experience.
Hong C; Bae KT; Pilgram TK; Zhu F
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 12832574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of coronary artery calcium with multi-detector row CT: assessing interscan variability with different tube currents pilot study.
Takahashi N; Bae KT
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 12832575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for lower variability of coronary artery calcium mineral mass measurements by multi-detector computed tomography in a community-based cohort--consequences for progression studies.
Hoffmann U; Siebert U; Bull-Stewart A; Achenbach S; Ferencik M; Moselewski F; Brady TJ; Massaro JM; O'Donnell CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 16434160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality.
Herzog C; Arning-Erb M; Zangos S; Eichler K; Hammerstingl R; Dogan S; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 16373760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT.
Kopp AF; Ohnesorge B; Becker C; Schröder S; Heuschmid M; Küttner A; Kuzo R; Claussen CD
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 12354993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Influence of heart rate and cardiac phases on image quality using 320-detector row CT].
Sun G; Li M; Li GY; Ding J; Li SH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 91(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21418953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT.
Stanford W; Thompson BH; Burns TL; Heery SD; Burr MC
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 14752183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality.
Hong C; Becker CR; Huber A; Schoepf UJ; Ohnesorge B; Knez A; Brüning R; Reiser MF
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 11526271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality.
Leschka S; Wildermuth S; Boehm T; Desbiolles L; Husmann L; Plass A; Koepfli P; Schepis T; Marincek B; Kaufmann PA; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):378-85. PubMed ID: 16966483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging.
Yamamuro M; Tadamura E; Kubo S; Toyoda H; Nishina T; Ohba M; Hosokawa R; Kimura T; Tamaki N; Komeda M; Kita T; Konishi J
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 15670995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coronary artery calcium: accuracy and reproducibility of measurements with multi-detector row CT--assessment of effects of different thresholds and quantification methods.
Hong C; Bae KT; Pilgram TK
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):795-801. PubMed ID: 12728184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multidetector row CT coronary angiography: technique and preliminary experience.
Romagnoli A; Nisini A; Gandini R; Tomassini M; Fabiano S; Pocek M; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(5-6):443-55. PubMed ID: 12207180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability.
Matt D; Scheffel H; Leschka S; Flohr TG; Marincek B; Kaufmann PA; Alkadhi H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):567-73. PubMed ID: 17715102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of image quality of 64-row Dual Source versus Single Source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study.
Dikkers R; Greuter MJ; Kristanto W; van Ooijen PM; Sijens PE; Willems TP; Oudkerk M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 18308496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phantom-calibrated versus automatic coronary artery mass quantification with multidetector-row computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo study.
Serafin Z; Lasek W; Laskowska K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Nov; 49(9):1007-15. PubMed ID: 18720083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coronary artery calcium score: influence of reconstruction interval at 16-detector row CT with retrospective electrocardiographic gating.
Schlosser T; Hunold P; Schmermund A; Kühl H; Waltering KU; Debatin JF; Barkhausen J
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):586-9. PubMed ID: 15459323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT.
Hunold P; Vogt FM; Schmermund A; Debatin JF; Kerkhoff G; Budde T; Erbel R; Ewen K; Barkhausen J
Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 12511683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary calcium quantification using various calibration phantoms and scoring thresholds.
Ferencik M; Ferullo A; Achenbach S; Abbara S; Chan RC; Booth SL; Brady TJ; Hoffmann U
Invest Radiol; 2003 Sep; 38(9):559-66. PubMed ID: 12960525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate.
Hoffmann MH; Shi H; Manzke R; Schmid FT; De Vries L; Grass M; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15550373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
