128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12832866)
1. A template for forward planning in prostate cancer treatment: conformal irradiation with segmental intensity-modulation.
Taira S; Hizume M; Note I; Sugimoto J; Okita R
Igaku Butsuri; 2003; 23(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 12832866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Practical aspects of inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a radiation treatment planner's perspective.
Parker W; Patrocinio H
Can J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():48-52. PubMed ID: 16018834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
O'Neill L; Armstrong J; Buckney S; Assiri M; Cannon M; Holmberg O
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pelvic nodal dose escalation with prostate hypofractionation using conformal avoidance defined (H-CAD) intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Hong TS; Tomé WA; Jaradat H; Raisbeck BM; Ritter MA
Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 16938815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric advantages of IMRT simultaneous integrated boost for high-risk prostate cancer.
Li XA; Wang JZ; Jursinic PA; Lawton CA; Wang D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1251-7. PubMed ID: 15752907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer.
Luo C; Yang CC; Narayan S; Stern RL; Perks J; Goldberg Z; Ryu J; Purdy JA; Vijayakumar S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(4):1253-62. PubMed ID: 17145540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simplified intensity-modulated arc therapy for dose escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Bauman G; Gete E; Chen JZ; Wong E
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 15023389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Constraints and dosage for prostate cancer patients treated with conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy].
Chauvet I; Gaboriaud G; Pontvert D; Zefkili S; Giraud P; Rosenwald JC; Cosset JM
Cancer Radiother; 2004 Dec; 8(6):337-51. PubMed ID: 15619378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose to bone marrow using IMRT techniques in prostate cancer patients.
Gershkevitsh E; Clark CH; Staffurth J; Dearnaley DP; Trott KR
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Mar; 181(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 15756521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
