These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. First salvo in transatlantic food fight is far from last word. Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):737-8. PubMed ID: 12833087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. EU reflects European public opinion. Barnes MH Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):975-6. PubMed ID: 12949552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Action needed to harmonize regulation of low-level presence of biotech traits. Krueger R; Le Buanec B Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 18259165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns. König A Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. FDA on transgenic animals--a dog's breakfast? Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 18259164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. GM labeling in China beset by problems. Jia H Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):835-6. PubMed ID: 12894183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The fear factor. Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):957. PubMed ID: 12355098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective. Vasil IK Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the battle over genetically modified foods finally over? Saleh-Lakha S; Glick BR Biotechnol Adv; 2005 Mar; 23(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 15694121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety assessment, detection and traceability, and societal aspects of genetically modified foods. European Network on Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Food Crops (ENTRANSFOOD). Concluding remarks. Kuiper HA; König A; Kleter GA; Hammes WP; Knudsen I; Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1195-202. PubMed ID: 15123387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Codex task force agrees on final draft of principles for the evaluation of GM foods. J Adv Nurs; 2002 Sep; 39(5):408. PubMed ID: 12229859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved evaluation of potential allergens in GM food. Jank B; Haslberger AG Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):249-50. PubMed ID: 12788543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A risk-based classification scheme for genetically modified foods. I: Conceptual development. Chao E; Krewski D Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):208-22. PubMed ID: 18778747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Questions linger over European GM food regulations. Ramón D; MacCabe A; Gil JV Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):149. PubMed ID: 14755281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. EU to monitor for Chinese GM rice. Huggett B Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):478. PubMed ID: 18464757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NAS issues mixed message on unintended effects of GM food. Fox JL Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1062. PubMed ID: 15340456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]