BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12833540)

  • 1. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from secondary structures using optimized potentials.
    Hoang TX; Seno F; Banavar JR; Cieplak M; Maritan A
    Proteins; 2003 Aug; 52(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 12833540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TOUCHSTONEX: protein structure prediction with sparse NMR data.
    Li W; Zhang Y; Kihara D; Huang YJ; Zheng D; Montelione GT; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):290-306. PubMed ID: 14517980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimalist representations and the importance of nearest neighbor effects in protein folding simulations.
    Colubri A; Jha AK; Shen MY; Sali A; Berry RS; Sosnick TR; Freed KF
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Nov; 363(4):835-57. PubMed ID: 16982067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer simulations of protein folding with a small number of distance restraints.
    Sikorski A; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Acta Biochim Pol; 2002; 49(3):683-92. PubMed ID: 12422238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing physical energy functions for protein folding.
    Fujitsuka Y; Takada S; Luthey-Schulten ZA; Wolynes PG
    Proteins; 2004 Jan; 54(1):88-103. PubMed ID: 14705026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contact pair dynamics during folding of two small proteins: chicken villin head piece and the Alzheimer protein beta-amyloid.
    Mukherjee A; Bagchi B
    J Chem Phys; 2004 Jan; 120(3):1602-12. PubMed ID: 15268287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Native atomic burials, supplemented by physically motivated hydrogen bond constraints, contain sufficient information to determine the tertiary structure of small globular proteins.
    Pereira de Araújo AF; Gomes AL; Bursztyn AA; Shakhnovich EI
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):971-83. PubMed ID: 17847091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints.
    Skolnick J; Kolinski A; Ortiz AR
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Jan; 265(2):217-41. PubMed ID: 9020984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folding in lipid membranes (FILM): a novel method for the prediction of small membrane protein 3D structures.
    Pellegrini-Calace M; Carotti A; Jones DT
    Proteins; 2003 Mar; 50(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 12577259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.
    Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Apr; 25(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 15011258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tertiary structure prediction of mixed alpha/beta proteins via energy minimization.
    Standley DM; Gunn JR; Friesner RA; McDermott AE
    Proteins; 1998 Nov; 33(2):240-52. PubMed ID: 9779791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All-atom ab initio folding of a diverse set of proteins.
    Yang JS; Chen WW; Skolnick J; Shakhnovich EI
    Structure; 2007 Jan; 15(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 17223532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the role of the topology in protein folding by computational inverse folding experiments.
    Mucherino A; Costantini S; di Serafino D; D'Apuzzo M; Facchiano A; Colonna G
    Comput Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 32(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 18479970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A reduced protein model with accurate native-structure identification ability.
    Betancourt MR
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):889-907. PubMed ID: 14635131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal potentials for predicting inter-helical packing in transmembrane proteins.
    Dobbs H; Orlandini E; Bonaccini R; Seno F
    Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 12360524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein structure prediction based on fragment assembly and parameter optimization.
    Lee J; Kim SY; Lee J
    Biophys Chem; 2005 Apr; 115(2-3):209-14. PubMed ID: 15752606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.
    Liu S; Zhang C; Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15162489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural determinants of transmembrane helical proteins.
    Harrington SE; Ben-Tal N
    Structure; 2009 Aug; 17(8):1092-103. PubMed ID: 19679087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein conformational transitions coupled to binding in molecular recognition of unstructured proteins: deciphering the effect of intermolecular interactions on computational structure prediction of the p27Kip1 protein bound to the cyclin A-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 complex.
    Verkhivker GM
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):706-16. PubMed ID: 15609350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.