These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12833717)

  • 1. Supreme Court deals another blow to managed care industry. Kentucky Ass'n of Health Plans v. Miller.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2003 Jul; 20(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 12833717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supreme court upholds state independent review laws: does this help or hinder health plans?
    Bloom A
    Manag Care Interface; 2002 Sep; 15(9):56-7, 61. PubMed ID: 12244651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller.
    Gutmann V
    J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(4):729-31. PubMed ID: 14968676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should your ERISA remedy depend upon your geography?: an analysis of Rush Prudential HMO, INC. v. Moran.
    Schulz AM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 19(2):553-71. PubMed ID: 14748257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Any Willing Provider" laws not preempted by Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. et. al. v. Miller, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Insurance.
    Benefits Q; 2004; 20(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 15453199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kentucky's 'any-willing-provider' law: Supreme Court says ERISA does not pre-empt statute.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Jun; 134(6):766-7. PubMed ID: 12839414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The final chapter (maybe) of preemption of HMO accountability under state law.
    Jordan K
    Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Feb; ():15-27. PubMed ID: 14989070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. Supreme Court approves Kentucky "any willing provider" statute.
    McGinty C; Herron S
    GHA Today; 2003 May; 47(5):3. PubMed ID: 12845911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ready and willing.
    Borges W
    Tex Med; 2003 Jun; 99(6):35-7. PubMed ID: 12836574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High court upholds independent physician reviews under state law.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Jul; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12420399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court rejects preemption in ERISA benefits dispute. Rush Prudential, Inc. v. Moran.
    Morreim EH
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 Nov; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12412312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERISA preemption conflict in the Third Circuit.
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Dec; ():8-11. PubMed ID: 12596431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care.
    Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supreme Court clarifies the breadth of ERISA preemption.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Oct; 21(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15495741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Willing and able. Supreme Court ruling forces HMOs to open networks to any willing provider; some say it may wound managed-care industry.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Apr; 33(14):6-7, 1. PubMed ID: 12712635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AWP reimbursement ruling may be more than meets eye.
    Carroll J
    Manag Care; 2003 May; 12(5):12, 14. PubMed ID: 12800739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
    Mariner WK
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERISA: no preemption of state's HMO law requiring independent physician review.
    Sapeika T
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 11317432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.