BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12834418)

  • 1. Reliability of the MRCP(UK) Part I Examination, 1984-2001.
    McManus IC; Mooney-Somers J; Dacre JE; Vale JA; ;
    Med Educ; 2003 Jul; 37(7):609-11. PubMed ID: 12834418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in standard of candidates taking the MRCP(UK) Part 1 examination, 1985 to 2002: analysis of marker questions.
    McManus IC; Mollon J; Duke OL; Vale JA
    BMC Med; 2005 Jul; 3():13. PubMed ID: 16026607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The standard error of measurement is a more appropriate measure of quality for postgraduate medical assessments than is reliability: an analysis of MRCP(UK) examinations.
    Tighe J; McManus IC; Dewhurst NG; Chis L; Mucklow J
    BMC Med Educ; 2010 Jun; 10():40. PubMed ID: 20525220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dishonesty in the MRCP(UK) Part 1 and Part 2 written examinations: prevention, detection and possible remediation.
    Roberts T; Russell A; Radziejowska R
    Clin Med (Lond); 2011 Jun; 11(3):239-41. PubMed ID: 21902075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PLAB and UK graduates' performance on MRCP(UK) and MRCGP examinations: data linkage study.
    McManus IC; Wakeford R
    BMJ; 2014 Apr; 348():g2621. PubMed ID: 24742473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and implementation of the specialty certificate examinations.
    Mucklow J
    Clin Med (Lond); 2011 Jun; 11(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 21902074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study.
    Wakeford R; Ludka K; Woolf K; McManus IC
    BMC Med; 2018 Dec; 16(1):230. PubMed ID: 30522486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling.
    McManus IC; Thompson M; Mollon J
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():42. PubMed ID: 16919156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs), psychiatry and the Clinical assessment of Skills and Competencies (CASC) same evidence, different judgement.
    Marwaha S
    BMC Psychiatry; 2011 May; 11():85. PubMed ID: 21575216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRCP(UK) PART 2 Clinical Examination (PACES): a review of the first four examination sessions (June 2001 - July 2002).
    Dacre J; Besser M; White P;
    Clin Med (Lond); 2003; 3(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 14601946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using tagged items to detect threats to security in a nationally administered standardized patient examination.
    MacMillan MK; De Champlain AF; Klass DJ
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10 Suppl):S55-7. PubMed ID: 10536593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?
    Wass V; McGibbon D; Van der Vleuten C
    Med Educ; 2001 Apr; 35(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 11318994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer assisted Objective structured clinical examination versus Objective structured clinical examination in assessment of Dermatology undergraduate students.
    Chaudhary R; Grover C; Bhattacharya SN; Sharma A
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2017; 83(4):448-452. PubMed ID: 28540874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools.
    Chesser A; Cameron H; Evans P; Cleland J; Boursicot K; Mires G
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 19493176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judges' perception of candidates' organization and communication, in relation to oral certification examination ratings.
    Houston JE; Myford CM
    Acad Med; 2009 Nov; 84(11):1603-9. PubMed ID: 19858824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of the direct observation clinical encounter examination (DOCEE).
    Hamdy H; Prasad K; Williams R; Salih FA
    Med Educ; 2003 Mar; 37(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 12603759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survey of candidates taking the MRCP(UK) Part 2 examination.
    Sanderson M
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1996; 30(6):523-6. PubMed ID: 8961206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward Competency-Based Medical Education.
    Powell DE; Carraccio C
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Jan; 378(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 29298154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on 'a systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores'.
    Fuller R; Pell G; Homer M; Roberts T
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):337. PubMed ID: 22324534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. OCEX reliability.
    Lee AG; Carter K
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):717; author reply 717-8. PubMed ID: 16581438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.