These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12835158)

  • 1. Update on breast imaging. New imaging techniques have led to advances in breast cancer detection. What does that mean for the annual mammogram?
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2003 Jun; 10(10):4-6. PubMed ID: 12835158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 May; 17(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 20593556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast imaging. Picturing the latest breast cancer detection methods.
    Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2006 May; 10(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16585920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Collins MJ; Hoffmeister J; Worrell SW
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2006 Aug; 27(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 16916003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New technologies in breast imaging.
    Patterson SK
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2003 Apr; 1(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 19768885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent advances in breast-specific imaging.
    Berman CG
    Cancer Control; 2007 Oct; 14(4):338-49. PubMed ID: 17914334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection.
    Singh V; Saunders C; Wylie L; Bourke A
    Future Oncol; 2008 Aug; 4(4):501-13. PubMed ID: 18684061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.
    Weinstein S; Rosen M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advances in imaging of inflammatory breast cancer.
    Yang WT
    Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11 Suppl):2755-7. PubMed ID: 20503406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hata T; Takahashi H; Watanabe K; Takahashi M; Taguchi K; Itoh T; Todo S
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Feb; 198(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 14759774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests for breast cancer. Mammography is going digital. But is it better than film?
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 May; 32(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 17575613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Imaging methods in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Reiser M
    Bildgebung; 1995 Sep; 62(3):160-72. PubMed ID: 7496112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging methods for the diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Yuan C; Kong X; Yuan M
    Asian J Surg; 2024 Jun; 47(6):2748-2749. PubMed ID: 38531743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.
    Adler DD; Wahl RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer.
    Smith JA; Andreopoulou E
    Ann Oncol; 2004; 15 Suppl 1():I18-I26. PubMed ID: 15280183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer: pre- and postoperative imaging for staging.
    Hansen NM; Growney A
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2007 Apr; 16(2):447-63. PubMed ID: 17560522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer.
    Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):859-78. PubMed ID: 20868890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.