These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12835262)

  • 1. Toxicology analysis by means of the JSM-method.
    Blinova VG; Dobrynin DA; Finn VK; Kuznetsov SO; Pankratova ES
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1201-7. PubMed ID: 12835262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristic substructures and properties in chemical carcinogens studied by the cascade model.
    Okada T
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1208-15. PubMed ID: 12835263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical evaluation of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001.
    Toivonen H; Srinivasan A; King RD; Kramer S; Helma C
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1183-93. PubMed ID: 12835260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Putting the Predictive Toxicology Challenge into perspective: reflections on the results.
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1194-200. PubMed ID: 12835261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001.
    Helma C; Kramer S
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1179-82. PubMed ID: 12835259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing computational toxicology models with phytochemicals.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Busta E; Minnier BL; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Feb; 54(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 20024931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data quality in predictive toxicology: reproducibility of rodent carcinogenicity experiments.
    Gottmann E; Kramer S; Pfahringer B; Helma C
    Environ Health Perspect; 2001 May; 109(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 11401763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of QSAR models for predicting hepatocarcinogenic toxicity of chemicals.
    Massarelli I; Imbriani M; Coi A; Saraceno M; Carli N; Bianucci AM
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 44(9):3658-64. PubMed ID: 19272677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How well can in vitro data predict in vivo effects of chemicals? Rodent carcinogenicity as a case study.
    Anthony Tony Cox L; Popken DA; Kaplan AM; Plunkett LM; Becker RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():54-64. PubMed ID: 26879462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. QSAR modelling of carcinogenicity by balance of correlations.
    Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Benfenati E; Manganaro A
    Mol Divers; 2009 Aug; 13(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 19190994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
    Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
    Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of the carcinogenicity in rodents of chemicals currently being tested by the US National Toxicology Program: structure-activity correlations.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Mutagenesis; 1990 Sep; 5(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 2263200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel naïve Bayes classification models for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals.
    Zhang H; Cao ZX; Li M; Li YZ; Peng C
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2016 Nov; 97():141-149. PubMed ID: 27597133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The first US National Toxicology Program exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results.
    Benigni R
    Mutat Res; 1997 Aug; 387(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 9254891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for 44 chemicals: results.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW
    Mutagenesis; 1994 Jan; 9(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 8208133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structure-activity relations: maximizing the usefulness of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity databases.
    Klopman G; Rosenkranz H
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():67-75. PubMed ID: 1820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.