These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12835281)

  • 1. Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.
    Kipnis V; Subar AF; Midthune D; Freedman LS; Ballard-Barbash R; Troiano RP; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Schatzkin A; Carroll RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):14-21; discussion 22-6. PubMed ID: 12835281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study.
    Subar AF; Kipnis V; Troiano RP; Midthune D; Schoeller DA; Bingham S; Sharbaugh CO; Trabulsi J; Runswick S; Ballard-Barbash R; Sunshine J; Schatzkin A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12835280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.
    Schatzkin A; Kipnis V; Carroll RJ; Midthune D; Subar AF; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Troiano RP; Freedman LS
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 32(6):1054-62. PubMed ID: 14681273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods.
    Kroke A; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Voss S; Möseneder J; Thielecke F; Noack R; Boeing H
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1999 Oct; 70(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 10500011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications.
    Kipnis V; Midthune D; Freedman LS; Bingham S; Schatzkin A; Subar A; Carroll RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 153(4):394-403. PubMed ID: 11207158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake.
    Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Boshuizen HC; Hulshof PJ; Hollman PC; van 't Veer P; Geelen A
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Oct; 114(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 26314241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology.
    Kipnis V; Midthune D; Freedman L; Bingham S; Day NE; Riboli E; Ferrari P; Carroll RJ
    Public Health Nutr; 2002 Dec; 5(6A):915-23. PubMed ID: 12633516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the 24-Hour Recall as a Reference Instrument for Calibrating Other Self-Report Instruments in Nutritional Cohort Studies: Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project.
    Freedman LS; Commins JM; Willett W; Tinker LF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Baer DJ; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 186(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 28402488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. OPEN about obesity: recovery biomarkers, dietary reporting errors and BMI.
    Lissner L; Troiano RP; Midthune D; Heitmann BL; Kipnis V; Subar AF; Potischman N
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jun; 31(6):956-61. PubMed ID: 17299385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of approaches to correct intake–health associations for FFQ measurement error using a duplicate recovery biomarker and a duplicate 24 h dietary recall as reference method.
    Geelen A; Souverein OW; Busstra MC; de Vries JH; van't Veer P
    Public Health Nutr; 2015 Feb; 18(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 24499731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The validity of a web-based FFQ assessed by doubly labelled water and multiple 24-h recalls.
    Medin AC; Carlsen MH; Hambly C; Speakman JR; Strohmaier S; Andersen LF
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 118(12):1106-1117. PubMed ID: 29202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement Error Affecting Web- and Paper-Based Dietary Assessment Instruments: Insights From the Multi-Cohort Eating and Activity Study for Understanding Reporting Error.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Troiano RP; Barrett B; Cunningham C; Subar AF; Park Y; Bowles HR; Freedman LS; Kipnis V; Rimm EB; Willett WC; Potischman N; Spielgelman D; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Dodd KW
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1125-1139. PubMed ID: 35136928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dietary evaluation and attenuation of relative risk: multiple comparisons between blood and urinary biomarkers, food frequency, and 24-hour recall questionnaires: the DEARR study.
    Shai I; Rosner BA; Shahar DR; Vardi H; Azrad AB; Kanfi A; Schwarzfuchs D; Fraser D;
    J Nutr; 2005 Mar; 135(3):573-9. PubMed ID: 15735096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of Absolute Intake and Nutrient Density of Protein, Potassium, and Sodium Assessed by Various Dietary Assessment Methods: An Exploratory Study.
    Trijsburg L; Geelen A; Hulshof PJM; Van't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; Hollman PCH; van Dijk G; Feskens EJM; de Vries JHM
    Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validating an FFQ for intake of episodically consumed foods: application to the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.
    Midthune D; Schatzkin A; Subar AF; Thompson FE; Freedman LS; Carroll RJ; Shumakovich MA; Kipnis V
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Jul; 14(7):1212-21. PubMed ID: 21486523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a urinary sugars biomarker to assess measurement error in self-reported sugars intake in the nutrition and physical activity assessment study (NPAAS).
    Tasevska N; Midthune D; Tinker LF; Potischman N; Lampe JW; Neuhouser ML; Beasley JM; Van Horn L; Prentice RL; Kipnis V
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Dec; 23(12):2874-83. PubMed ID: 25234237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FFQ versus repeated 24-h recalls for estimating diet-related environmental impact.
    Mertens E; Kuijsten A; Geleijnse JM; Boshuizen HC; Feskens EJM; Van't Veer P
    Nutr J; 2019 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 30621736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of a food-frequency questionnaire in the US NIH-AARP (National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study.
    Thompson FE; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Freedman LS; Carroll RJ; Subar AF; Brown CC; Butcher MS; Mouw T; Leitzmann M; Schatzkin A
    Public Health Nutr; 2008 Feb; 11(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 17610761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake.
    Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Arab L; Baer DJ; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Moshfegh AJ; Neuhouser ML; Prentice RL; Schatzkin A; Spiegelman D; Subar AF; Tinker LF; Willett W
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 180(2):172-88. PubMed ID: 24918187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study.
    Tooze JA; Subar AF; Thompson FE; Troiano R; Schatzkin A; Kipnis V
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2004 May; 79(5):795-804. PubMed ID: 15113717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.