186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12836574)
1. Ready and willing.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2003 Jun; 99(6):35-7. PubMed ID: 12836574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. Supreme Court approves Kentucky "any willing provider" statute.
McGinty C; Herron S
GHA Today; 2003 May; 47(5):3. PubMed ID: 12845911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Zinberg JM
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15651122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
Goodyear J
Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AWP reimbursement ruling may be more than meets eye.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2003 May; 12(5):12, 14. PubMed ID: 12800739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care.
Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Supreme Court deals another blow to managed care industry. Kentucky Ass'n of Health Plans v. Miller.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2003 Jul; 20(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 12833717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Undermining ERISA.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2000 Aug; 96(8):34-8. PubMed ID: 10948835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cracks in the wall. Court decisions penetrate ERISA's invulnerability.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2003 Mar; 99(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 12674976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations.
Jost TS
Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court may be managed care's new best friend.
Plunkett LR
N Y State Dent J; 2000 Nov; 66(9):6-8. PubMed ID: 11143725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The United State Supreme Court and health law: the year in review. The Supreme Court federalizes managed care liability.
Ruger TW
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15490600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. District court rules on Texas Health Care Liability Act.
Hansen E
Manag Care Interface; 1998 Nov; 11(11):87-8. PubMed ID: 10187421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The "Texas bill".
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 1998 Apr; 94(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 9564256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Case law update. State law negligence actions against MCOs are pre-empted by ERISA.
West JC
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2004; 24(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 20196010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is ethics for sale?... Juggling law and ethics in managed care.
McKoy JM; Karsjens KL; Wynia M; MacDonald-Glenn L
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(3):559-613. PubMed ID: 16619425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Kentucky's 'any-willing-provider' law: Supreme Court says ERISA does not pre-empt statute.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Jun; 134(6):766-7. PubMed ID: 12839414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
