These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12836815)

  • 1. A spatially explicit individual-based model of reinforcement in hybrid zones.
    Sadedin S; Littlejohn MJ
    Evolution; 2003 May; 57(5):962-70. PubMed ID: 12836815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mate Choice Drives Evolutionary Stability in a Hybrid Complex.
    Morgado-Santos M; Pereira HM; Vicente L; Collares-Pereira MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132760. PubMed ID: 26181664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tracing reinforcement through asymmetrical partner preference in the European common vole Microtus arvalis.
    Beysard M; Krebs-Wheaton R; Heckel G
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Aug; 15():170. PubMed ID: 26303785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of Wolbachia versus genetic incompatibilities on reinforcement and speciation.
    Telschow A; Hammerstein P; Werren JH
    Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1607-19. PubMed ID: 16329235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paternal imprinting of mating preferences between natural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus).
    Montero I; Teschke M; Tautz D
    Mol Ecol; 2013 May; 22(9):2549-62. PubMed ID: 23506395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.
    Nosil P; Crespi BJ; Gries R; Gries G
    Genetica; 2007 Mar; 129(3):309-27. PubMed ID: 16900317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):913-24. PubMed ID: 15212372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely.
    Arnegard ME; Kondrashov AS
    Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):222-37. PubMed ID: 15068341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isolation-by-distance and outbreeding depression are sufficient to drive parapatric speciation in the absence of environmental influences.
    Hoelzer GA; Drewes R; Meier J; Doursat R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):e1000126. PubMed ID: 18654617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcement during ecological speciation.
    Kirkpatrick M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jun; 268(1473):1259-63. PubMed ID: 11410152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nuclear markers, mitochondrial DNA and male secondary sexual traits variation in a newt hybrid zone (Triturus vulgaris x T. montandoni).
    Babik W; Szymura JM; Rafiński J
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jul; 12(7):1913-30. PubMed ID: 12803641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The maintenance of hybrid zones across a disturbance gradient.
    Dorken ME; Pannell JR
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jul; 99(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 17426730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies.
    Kronforst MR; Young LG; Gilbert LE
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):278-85. PubMed ID: 17210020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A test of alternative hypotheses for the evolution of reproductive isolation between spadefoot toads: support for the reinforcement hypothesis.
    Pfennig KS
    Evolution; 2003 Dec; 57(12):2842-51. PubMed ID: 14761062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus.
    Jiggins CD; Estrada C; Rodrigues A
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):680-91. PubMed ID: 15149410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
    Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in the house mouse.
    Smadja C; Ganem G
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1485-93. PubMed ID: 16313461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inheritance of female mating preference in a sympatric sibling species pair of Lake Victoria cichlids: implications for speciation.
    Haesler MP; Seehausen O
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Feb; 272(1560):237-45. PubMed ID: 15705547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.