These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12836845)

  • 1. Aligning chemical assessment tools across the hazard-risk continuum.
    Pittinger CA; Brennan TH; Badger DA; Hakkinen PJ; Fehrenbacher MC
    Risk Anal; 2003 Jun; 23(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 12836845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporation of potential for multimedia exposure into chemical hazard scores for pollution prevention.
    Whaley DA; Meloy TP; Barrett SS; Bedillion EJ
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):241-73. PubMed ID: 10189582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of intake from the diet.
    Kroes R; Müller D; Lambe J; Löwik MR; van Klaveren J; Kleiner J; Massey R; Mayer S; Urieta I; Verger P; Visconti A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2002; 40(2-3):327-85. PubMed ID: 11893401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
    Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of five hazard screening tools.
    Panko JM; Hitchcock K; Fung M; Spencer PJ; Kingsbury T; Mason AM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):139-154. PubMed ID: 26777143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicted no effect concentration derivation as a significant source of variability in environmental hazard assessments of chemicals in aquatic systems: an international analysis.
    Hahn T; Diamond J; Dobson S; Howe P; Kielhorn J; Koennecker G; Lee-Steere C; Mangelsdorf I; Schneider U; Sugaya Y; Taylor K; Dam RV; Stauber JL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23913910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of professional judgment in chemical hazard assessment and communication.
    Hamilton JD; Daggett DA; Pittinger CA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Oct; 46(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 16843576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemical assessment state of the science: Evaluation of 32 decision-support tools used to screen and prioritize chemicals.
    Gauthier AM; Fung M; Panko J; Kingsbury T; Perez AL; Hitchcock K; Ferracini T; Sahmel J; Banducci A; Jacobsen M; Abelmann A; Shay E
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Apr; 11(2):242-55. PubMed ID: 25377590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using chemical categories to fill data gaps in hazard assessment.
    van Leeuwen K; Schultz TW; Henry T; Diderich B; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(3-4):207-20. PubMed ID: 19544189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advancing the science on chemical classes.
    Maffini MV; Rayasam SDG; Axelrad DA; Birnbaum LS; Cooper C; Franjevic S; MacRoy PM; Nachman KE; Patisaul HB; Rodgers KM; Rossi MS; Schettler T; Solomon GM; Woodruff TJ
    Environ Health; 2023 Jan; 21(Suppl 1):120. PubMed ID: 36635752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hazard banding in compliance with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for use in control banding tools.
    Arnone M; Koppisch D; Smola T; Gabriel S; Verbist K; Visser R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Oct; 73(1):287-95. PubMed ID: 26206396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When Are Adverse Outcome Pathways and Associated Assays "Fit for Purpose" for Regulatory Decision-Making and Management of Chemicals?
    Coady K; Browne P; Embry M; Hill T; Leinala E; Steeger T; Maślankiewicz L; Hutchinson T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jul; 15(4):633-647. PubMed ID: 30908812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A decision support framework for characterizing and managing dermal exposures to chemicals during Emergency Management and Operations.
    Dotson GS; Hudson NL; Maier A
    J Emerg Manag; 2015; 13(4):359-80. PubMed ID: 26312660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of computer based structure-activity relationships in the risk assessment of industrial chemicals.
    Karcher W; Karabunarliev S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 1996; 36(4):672-7. PubMed ID: 8768762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Policies for chemical hazard and risk priority setting: can persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, and quantity information be combined?
    Arnot JA; Mackay D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jul; 42(13):4648-54. PubMed ID: 18677986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The applicability of chemical alternatives assessment for engineered nanomaterials.
    Hjorth R; Hansen SF; Jacobs M; Tickner J; Ellenbecker M; Baun A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 26887668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations.
    Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Classification and risk assessment: complementary or mutually exclusive approaches?].
    Moretto A
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2017 Nov; 39(3):152-154. PubMed ID: 29916577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publicly-accessible QSAR software tools developed by the Joint Research Centre.
    Pavan M; Worth AP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(7-8):785-99. PubMed ID: 19061088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.