255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12837413)
1. Practice trends in contemporary management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Marcovich R; Jacobson AI; Aldana JP; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2003 Jul; 62(1):22-5; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 12837413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in ureteropelvic junction obstruction management among urologists in the United States.
Tan BJ; Rastinehad AR; Marcovich R; Smith AD; Lee BR
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 15708034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporary management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: practice patterns in Minnesota.
Fallon E; Ercole B; Lee C; Best S; Skenazy J; Monga M
J Endourol; 2005; 19(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 15735381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost Analysis of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
Jacobs BL; Seelam R; Lai JC; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27927021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade.
Yanke BV; Lallas CD; Pagnani C; McGinnis DE; Bagley DH
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18707717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults.
Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study.
Vemulakonda VM; Cowan CA; Lendvay TS; Joyner BD; Grady RW
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1689-92; discussion 1692. PubMed ID: 18708209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technique and results in 80 consecutive patients.
Castillo OA; Cabrera W; Aleman E; Vidal-Mora I; Yañez R
Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Mar; 38(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 23910728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what?
Tan BJ; Smith AD
Curr Opin Urol; 2004 Mar; 14(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 15075831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.
Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Wells N; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
Levin BM; Herrell SD
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Eden C; Gianduzzo T; Chang C; Thiruchelvam N; Jones A
J Urol; 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2308-11. PubMed ID: 15538255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endopyelotomy review.
Bernardo N; Smith AD
Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
