These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12837612)

  • 1. Naturalness and the genetic modification of animals.
    Verhoog H
    Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):294-7. PubMed ID: 12837612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs.
    Wynne B
    Sci Cult (Lond); 2001 Dec; 10(4):445-81. PubMed ID: 15971363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animal biotechnology: how not to presume.
    Thompson PB
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):49-50. PubMed ID: 18726782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Justifying a presumption of restraint in animal biotechnology research.
    Fiester A
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):36-44. PubMed ID: 18726779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biotechnology and conceptualizations of the soul.
    Silver LM
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2003; 12(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 14619366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Animal biotechnology and the non-identity problem.
    Streiffer R
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):47-8. PubMed ID: 18726781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic engineering: unnatural selection.
    Snow A
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):619. PubMed ID: 12904767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The moral difference between intragenic and transgenic modification of plants.
    Myskja BK
    J Agric Environ Ethics; 2006; 19(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 17061380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics and species integrity.
    Rollin BE
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 14594470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Genetically modified food (food derived from biotechnology): current and future trends in public acceptance and safety assessment].
    Nishiura H; Imai H; Nakao H; Tsukino H; Kuroda Y; Katoh T
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1135-41. PubMed ID: 12508467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intellectual property, genetically modified crops and bioethics.
    Adcock M
    Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1088-92. PubMed ID: 17703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic technologies meet the public: the discourses of concern.
    Lassen J; Jamison A
    Sci Technol Human Values; 2006 Jan; 31(1):8-28. PubMed ID: 16832965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The brave new world of animal biotechnology. Project report.
    Donnelley S; McCarthy CR; Singleton R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1 Suppl):S1-31. PubMed ID: 11654088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retracing liberalism and remaking nature: designer children, research embryos, and featherless chickens.
    Fox D
    Bioethics; 2010 May; 24(4):170-8. PubMed ID: 19222446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expert discourses of risk and ethics on genetically manipulated organisms: the weaving of public alienation.
    Wynne B
    Not Polit; 2001; 17(62):51-76. PubMed ID: 15468486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
    Oeschger MP; Silva CE
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial gametes, the unnatural and the artefactual.
    Smajdor A; Cutas D; Takala T
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 44(6):404-408. PubMed ID: 29507052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.
    Sturgis P; Cooper H; Fife-Schaw C
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 16552916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Food biotechnology's challenge to cultural integrity and individual consent.
    Thompson PB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 9271720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany.
    Christoph IB; Bruhn M; Roosen J
    Appetite; 2008 Jul; 51(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 18243411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.