These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Electrocochleography is more sensitive than distortion-product otoacoustic emission test for detecting noise-induced temporary threshold shift. Kim JS; Nam EC; Park SI Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Oct; 133(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16213939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure]. Plinkert PK; Hemmert W; Zenner HP HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Amplitude changes in distortion products of otoacoustic emissions after acute noise exposure]. Oeken J; Menz D Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 May; 75(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 8672208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds. Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops. Fetterman BL Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise. Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Paradoxical long-term enhancement of distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude after repeated exposure to moderate level, wide band noise in awake guinea pigs. Mei L; Huang ZW; Tao ZZ J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Oct; 123(10):1090-6. PubMed ID: 19607735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results for audiology and distortion product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Karabulut H; Dagli M; Ates A; Karaaslan Y J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Feb; 124(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 19852869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss. Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and tympanometric measurements in an adult population-based study. Uchida Y; Ando F; Nakata S; Ueda H; Nakashima T; Niino N; Shimokata H Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Dec; 33(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 16753276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of glucocorticoid receptor antagonist on CAPs threshold shift due to short-term sound exposure in guinea pigs. Mori T; Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Suzuki H Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Dec; 31(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 15571913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of three hours of discotheque music on pure-tone thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Müller J; Dietrich S; Janssen T J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1853-69. PubMed ID: 20968358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]