These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1283812)

  • 1. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment for adult, developmentally disabled, public wards: a proposed statute.
    McKnight DK; Bellis M
    Am J Law Med; 1992; 18(3):203-32. PubMed ID: 1283812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Terminating life-sustaining treatment of the demented.
    Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(6):25-31. PubMed ID: 8609015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
    Dippel DL
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Searching for proper judicial recognition of hospital ethics committees in decisions to forego medical treatment.
    Murphy CA
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1992 Apr; (158):7-32. PubMed ID: 10117813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life?
    Cerminara KL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody.
    Savage T; Michalak DR
    Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foregoing nutrition and hydration.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Competency to refuse lifesaving treatment: valuing the nonlogical aspects of a person's decisions.
    Snyder AC
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):299-320. PubMed ID: 7829306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The views of the judiciary regarding life-sustaining medical treatment decisions.
    Hafemeister TL; Robinson DM
    Law Psychol Rev; 1994; 18():189-246. PubMed ID: 16523577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care.
    Zuckerman C
    Generations; 1999; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17144036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
    Shapiro RS
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The case of Mr. Stevens.
    Cranford RE
    Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The incompetent developmentally disabled person's right of self-determination: right-to-die, sterilization and institutionalization.
    Krais WA
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):333-61. PubMed ID: 2603868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Constitution at the threshold of life and death: a suggested approach to accommodate an interest in life and a right to die.
    Allen MP
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):971-1020. PubMed ID: 15529470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment.
    Fletcher JC
    Va Med; 1989 Nov; 116(11):462-5. PubMed ID: 2815990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A medicine of strangers or a medicine of intimates. The two legacies of Karen Ann Quinlan.
    Siegler M
    Second Opin; 1992 Apr; 17(4):64-9. PubMed ID: 10118417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases.
    Elliott SJ
    Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forgoing life-sustaining treatment: limits to the consensus. Part 2.
    Veatch RM
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1993 Mar; 3(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 10124847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response to special section: ethical decision making and persons with mental retardation (CQ vol. 3, no. 2).
    Beltran JE
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 7627359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.