These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12838966)

  • 1. Radiologist training, not volume of readings, associated with accurate mammogram interpretations.
    Rollins G
    Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2003 Mar; 14(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 12838966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.
    Alpert HR; Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
    Lee JK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer error and acceptable standards for electrocardiographic interpretation.
    Spodick DH
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):348-9. PubMed ID: 16697395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Documentation for mammographers.
    Hendricks MM
    Radiol Technol; 2007; 78(5):396M-412M. PubMed ID: 17519376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CAD-aided mammogram training.
    Luo P; Qian W; Romilly P
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):1039-48. PubMed ID: 16087097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The new emphasis on quality and safety.
    Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):719. PubMed ID: 17411916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: part IV--practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology.
    Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):300-4. PubMed ID: 17467612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Turf wars in radiology: the past, present, and future importance of training standards in imaging.
    Rao VM; Levin DC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):602-6. PubMed ID: 17411885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Turf wars in radiology: the quality of interpretations of imaging studies by nonradiologist physicians--a patient safety issue?
    Levin DC; Rao VM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):506-9. PubMed ID: 17411640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RADPEER scoring white paper.
    Jackson VP; Cushing T; Abujudeh HH; Borgstede JP; Chin KW; Grimes CK; Larson DB; Larson PA; Pyatt RS; Thorwarth WT
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19111267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How do training, education, and experience affect quality in radiology?
    Weinreb JC; Wilcox PA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 17411641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RAD-AID Asha Jyoti Mammogram Quality Assessment in India: Optimizing Mobile Radiology.
    Mango VL; Ha R; Nguyen B; Mema E; Kobeski J; Singh T; Khandelwal N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jul; 13(7):831-4. PubMed ID: 27162043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
    Kullman L; Joseph B
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maintenance of certification.
    Madewell JE; Hattery RR; Thomas SR; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Merritt C; Davis LW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 17411756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disagreement in interpretation: a method for the development of benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging.
    Soffa DJ; Lewis RS; Sunshine JH; Bhargavan M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 17411562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of specialty and experience on the interpretation of knee MRI scans.
    Kim A; Khoury L; Schweitzer M; Jazrawi L; Ishak C; Meislin R; Kummer F; Sherman OH
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 19093902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria: the users' perspective.
    Jamal T; Gunderman RB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 18312960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
    Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should 12 months of training be required before diagnostic radiology residents take independent call? A survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology.
    Gunderman RB; Delaney LR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):590-4. PubMed ID: 17845962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.