These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12839121)

  • 21. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods.
    Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. IgE binding to proteins from sesame and assessment of allergenicity: implications for biotechnology?
    Orruño E; Morgan MR
    Biotechnol Lett; 2006 Dec; 28(23):1877-88. PubMed ID: 17028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical risk assessment of GM foods.
    Lack G
    Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):337-40. PubMed ID: 12052675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Assessment of allergenicity of genetically modified food crops].
    Schauzu M; Pöting A; Rubin D; Lampen A
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2012 Mar; 55(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 22373855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops.
    Kok EJ; Kuiper HA
    Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):439-44. PubMed ID: 14512230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Bar, Barnase, and Barstar recombinant proteins expressed in genetically engineered Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) for potential risks of food allergy using bioinformatics and literature searches.
    Siruguri V; Bharatraj DK; Vankudavath RN; Mendu VV; Gupta V; Goodman RE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Sep; 83():93-102. PubMed ID: 26079618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The allergenicity of genetically modified foods from genetically engineered crops: A narrative and systematic review.
    Dunn SE; Vicini JL; Glenn KC; Fleischer DM; Greenhawt MJ
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2017 Sep; 119(3):214-222.e3. PubMed ID: 28890018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diversity in food technology.
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):473. PubMed ID: 12891314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved evaluation of potential allergens in GM food.
    Jank B; Haslberger AG
    Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):249-50. PubMed ID: 12788543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Food biotechnology: benefits and concerns.
    Falk MC; Chassy BM; Harlander SK; Hoban TJ; McGloughlin MN; Akhlaghi AR
    J Nutr; 2002 Jun; 132(6):1384-90. PubMed ID: 12042463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance.
    Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H
    J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Workshop overview: approaches to the assessment of the allergenic potential of food from genetically modified crops.
    Ladics GS; Holsapple MP; Astwood JD; Kimber I; Knippels LM; Helm RM; Dong W
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 May; 73(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 12700419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biotech crops' seal of safety does not convince skeptics.
    Keogh B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Apr; 104(7):498-501. PubMed ID: 22440678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benefits and concerns associated with biotechnology-derived foods: can additional research reduce children health risks?
    Cantani A
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2009; 13(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 19364084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Food safety assessment of an antifungal protein from Moringa oleifera seeds in an agricultural biotechnology perspective.
    Pinto CE; Farias DF; Carvalho AF; Oliveira JT; Pereira ML; Grangeiro TB; Freire JE; Viana DA; Vasconcelos IM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Sep; 83():1-9. PubMed ID: 26032632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology: case studies: executive summary of a task force report by the International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, D.C.
    International Life Sciences Institute
    J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):R131-7. PubMed ID: 18034742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.