156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12839921)
1. Sexual offender commitment in the United States: legislative and policy concerns.
Fitch WL
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():489-501. PubMed ID: 12839921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kansas v. Hendricks.
Grudzinskas AJ; Henry MG
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 9460048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual predator commitment laws: lessons for law and the behavioral sciences.
Janus ES
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 10736574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. After Hendricks: defining constitutional treatment for Washington State's Civil commitment program.
Lieb R
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():474-88. PubMed ID: 12839920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual predator laws in Canada.
Glancy GD; Regehr C; Bradford J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 11471791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Law and the confinement of psychopaths.
Fitch WL; Ortega RJ
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(5):663-78. PubMed ID: 11113967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Victim and citizen perspectives on sexual offender policy.
Berliner L
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():464-73. PubMed ID: 12839919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The mythology of legal decision making.
Konecni VJ; Ebbesen EB
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1984; 7(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 6519866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: conceptualizing legal standards of "mental disorder" and "likely to reoffend".
Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Garrick T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 14974803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. Supreme Court upholds Kansas law allowing indefinite civil commitment of sexual offenders.
Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Aug; 48(8):1093-4. PubMed ID: 9255849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex offenders, mental illness and criminal responsibility: the constitutional boundaries of civil commitment after Kansas v. Hendricks.
Falk AJ
Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):117-47. PubMed ID: 10207572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of involuntary civil commitment in the U.S.A. after Kansas v. Hendricks.
La Fond JQ
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(2-3):153-67. PubMed ID: 10874286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kansas v. Hendricks: is it time to lock the door and throw away the key for sexually violent predators?
Kolebuck MD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):537-62. PubMed ID: 9693491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. From Hendricks to Crane: the sexually violent predator trilogy and the inchoate jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sarkar SP
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 12875504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The civil commitment of sex offenders.
Zonana H
Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1248-9. PubMed ID: 9411753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex offender commitments in Minnesota: a descriptive study of second generation commitments.
Janus ES; Walbek NH
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(2-3):343-74. PubMed ID: 10874293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. APA task force report urges strong opposition to laws committing sexual predators to mental health facilities. American Psychiatric Association.
Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Oct; 49(10):1375-6. PubMed ID: 9779920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legislative responses to sexual violence: an overview.
Janus ES
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():247-64; discussion 352-9. PubMed ID: 12839903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Washington State's unscientific approach to the problem of repeat sex offenders.
Brody AL; Green R
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 7841506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The forensic psychiatric system in the United States.
Bloom JD; Williams MH; Bigelow DA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2000; 23(5-6):605-13. PubMed ID: 11143957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
