153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12840730)
1. Impact factors: a tool of the sterile audit culture.
Tuck A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6944):14. PubMed ID: 12840730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
Skórka P
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Citations, impact factors and shady publication practices: how should the lasting clinical and social value of research really be measured?
O'Connor SJ
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 Mar; 19(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 20486987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.
Pendlebury DA
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
Shim EH; Parekh V
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?".
Goldstone RA
MedGenMed; 2006; 8(1):70; author reply 70. PubMed ID: 16967523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. CONSORT and QUOROM statements revisited: standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery.
Knobloch K; Gohritz A; Vogt PM
Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1106-7; discussion 1107-8. PubMed ID: 19092359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Standards to improve the reporting of clinical trials in acupuncture.
Hopewell S
Acupunct Med; 2010 Jun; 28(2):63. PubMed ID: 20615857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the impact factor.
Manske PR
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HIV denialists will exploit any journal's tolerance.
Moore JP
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):777. PubMed ID: 14985731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What weight does impact factor carry?
Aase S
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Neutralizing the impact factor culture.
Notkins AL
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):191. PubMed ID: 18845731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critics blast 'premature' paper on adult stem cells.
Schiermeier Q; Leeb M
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6992):590. PubMed ID: 15190319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process.
Afifi M
Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality evaluation needs some better quality tools.
Döring TF
Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7129):709. PubMed ID: 17301769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
