BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12840730)

  • 21. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review.
    Wenneras C; Wold A
    Nature; 1997 May; 387(6631):341-3. PubMed ID: 9163412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
    Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
    Oren GA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A longer paper gathers more citations.
    Ball P
    Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7211):274-5. PubMed ID: 18800099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pressure also leads to worthless publications.
    de Carvalho LB
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Paranoid about peer review?
    Rumjanek FD
    Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6609):509. PubMed ID: 8955262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Confidentiality.
    Guenin LM
    Science; 1996 Mar; 271(5257):1790. PubMed ID: 8596940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integrity of the peer review process.
    Smith ER
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Jun; 16(6):814. PubMed ID: 10863172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beyond the language barrier.
    Umakantha N
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):764. PubMed ID: 9039902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.
    Pearson H
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ArrayExpress service for reviewers/editors of DNA microarray papers.
    Brazma A; Parkinson H;
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1321-2. PubMed ID: 17093465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors.
    Verhagen JV; Wallace KJ; Collins SC; Scott TR
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):602. PubMed ID: 14668833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. CONSORT and beyond.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Life begins again at age 126!
    Pietrini P; Ghelarducci B
    Arch Ital Biol; 2008 Mar; 146(1):2p preceding 1. PubMed ID: 18666443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
    Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
    Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
    Mower A; Youngkin ME
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The misused impact factor.
    Simons K
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.