187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12841005)
1. [The system of scientific ethical committees].
Larsen NA
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2412-3. PubMed ID: 12841005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The scientific committee system].
Kamper-Jørgensen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Apr; 165(16):1680-2. PubMed ID: 12756830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Research ethics and revised law regarding the Danish Central Scientific Ethical Committee].
Kamper-Jørgensen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2337-40. PubMed ID: 15281571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulating clinical research: informed consent, privacy, and IRBs.
Hoffman S
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 15295833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review.
Hoffman S
Tenn Law Rev; 2001; 68(4):725-70. PubMed ID: 16189912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent in clinical research: policies and practices in Singapore.
Ramachandran AJ
J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15239181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The basics of human subjects protection.
Yoder LH
Medsurg Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(2):95-8; quiz 99. PubMed ID: 16700248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The IRB process needs to be reexamined.
Esaki R; Macario A; Harrison TK; Brock-Utne JG
Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1249-50. PubMed ID: 21515655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional conflicts of interest and research with human subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Feb; 18(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12814111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dermatology: obtaining a patient consent in clinical trials.
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2006 May 11-24; 15(9):500-1. PubMed ID: 16723924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New European rules regarding the approval of clinical trials, the role of ethics committees and the protection of subjects.
Nys H
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2012 Dec; 60(6):405-14. PubMed ID: 23064523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The basic right of human research subjects to be treated with dignity.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2004 Mar; 19(3):8. PubMed ID: 15139343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical decision making in committee. A view from Germany.
Sass HM
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):65-81. PubMed ID: 15282922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Lawsuits target medical research.
Dembner A
IRB; 2002; 24(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 13678031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HIPAA and what institutional review boards (IRBs) do not have to review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 15027429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics committees in Australia and New Zealand: a critique.
McNeill PM
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):113-9. PubMed ID: 15282928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The regional ethical committees. Responsibilities and challenges].
Fries AG; Nielsen DL
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2341-2. PubMed ID: 15281572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Case study: agency says institutional review board (IRB) did not fulfill duties so agency investigation expands.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
