These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12841005)

  • 21. Competing clinical trials in the same institution: ethical issues in subject selection and informed consent.
    Gordon EJ; Micetich KC
    IRB; 2002; 24(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12374154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Case study: institutional review board (IRB) did not know about subject problem until after study.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 May; 21(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical trials: a medical Catch-22. Researchers, institution boards must take appropriate steps to protect participants.
    Serbaroli F
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Oct; 32(41):23. PubMed ID: 12415995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Attitudes toward and experiences with clinical research among current and potential research subjects].
    Madsen SM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2343-4. PubMed ID: 15281573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Responsibilities of ethics committees].
    von Bergmann K
    Med Klin (Munich); 2000 May; 95(1 Spec No):15-7. PubMed ID: 10851843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research subject's complaint launches federal investigation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jan; 18(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12755096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fitting a square peg into a round hole?: imposing informed consent and post-trial obligations on United States sponsored clinical trials in developing countries.
    Chang E
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2002; 11(2):339-60. PubMed ID: 15732187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomedical research involving human subjects.
    Maleson S
    US Army Med Dep J; 2010; ():33-43. PubMed ID: 20467971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adequate protection for the autonomous research subject? The disclosure of sources of funding and commercialisation in genetic research trials.
    Cote A
    Manit Law J; 2002; 28(3):347-58. PubMed ID: 15162817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Regulations of the ethical evaluation system of scientific and clinical research in connection with Poland joining the European Union].
    Raszeja S
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(2-3):151-4. PubMed ID: 15495560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The "greater good"...at what cost?: how nontherapeutic scientific studies can now create viable negligence claims in Maryland after Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
    Gray CR
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 2002; 32(1):73-95. PubMed ID: 15233132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Obstacles to research in forensic psychiatry.
    Hillbrand M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 16186190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
    Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
    J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) would not answer her questions.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Feb; 21(2):7. PubMed ID: 16789309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. IRBs and monitoring the safety of clinical trials.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 12755095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What is the role of ethics committees after Regulation (EU) 536/2014?
    Petrini C
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Mar; 42(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 26644425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation.
    Tovino SA
    S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparing ethics committees from France and Quebec with respect to incapacity to consent to research].
    Bravo G; Dubois MF; Hansel S; Delpierre C; Duguet AM
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2009 Aug; 57(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 19540684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.