These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12841795)

  • 1. Comparison of ultrasound quality assurance phantom measurements from matched and mixed scanner-transducer combinations.
    Tradup DJ; Hangiandreou NJ; Taubel JP
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 12841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phantom-based quality assurance measurements in B-mode ultrasound.
    Mannila V; Sipilä O
    Acta Radiol Short Rep; 2013; 2(8):2047981613511967. PubMed ID: 24349715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography.
    Long Z; Tradup DJ; Song P; Stekel SF; Chen S; Glazebrook KN; Hangiandreou NJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):336-342. PubMed ID: 29542277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Daily quality assurance phantom for ultrasound image guided radiation therapy.
    Drever L; Hilts M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 8(3):126-136. PubMed ID: 17712304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of the suitability of tissue phantoms for testing the constancy of ultrasonic transducer arrays in quality assurance.
    Rosenfeld E; Wolter S; Kopp A; Liebscher E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 22576698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures.
    Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical Note: Proof of concept for radiomics-based quality assurance for computed tomography.
    Branco LRF; Ger RB; Mackin DS; Zhou S; Court LE; Layman RR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):199-205. PubMed ID: 31609076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound.
    Sipilä O; Mannila V; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 21144687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of phantom-based quality assurance parameters in real-time ultrasound imaging.
    Sipilä O; Blomqvist P; Jauhiainen M; Kilpeläinen T; Malaska P; Mannila V; Vinnurva-Jussila T; Virsula S
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 21508202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner.
    Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Gorny KR; Hangiandreou NJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 29336119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of acoustic velocity on phantom measurements.
    Goldstein A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 26(7):1133-43. PubMed ID: 11053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma using a standardized phantom and standard clinical images: a 3-year national investigation in Korea.
    Choi JI; Jung SE; Kim PN; Cha SH; Jun JK; Lee HY; Park EC
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jun; 33(6):985-95. PubMed ID: 24866605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2006-15. PubMed ID: 19610289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: application to ultrasound quality control.
    Gorny KR; Tradup DJ; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2615-28. PubMed ID: 16193792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 3D ultrasound scanning system for image guided liver interventions.
    Neshat H; Cool DW; Barker K; Gardi L; Kakani N; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112903. PubMed ID: 24320470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel-integrated quality assurance phantom for radiographic and nonradiographic radiotherapy localization and positioning systems.
    Yu AS; Fowler TL; Dubrowski P
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2857-2863. PubMed ID: 29730884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound grayscale image quality comparison between a 2D intracavitary transducer and a 3D intracavitary transducer used in 2D mode: A phantom study.
    Zhou W; Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Browne JE; Brown DL; Hangiandreou NJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):134-140. PubMed ID: 31002482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparative Study on the Influence of Probe Placement on Quality Assurance Measurements in B-mode Ultrasound by Means of Ultrasound Phantoms.
    Scorza A; Conforto S; D'Anna C; Sciuto SA
    Open Biomed Eng J; 2015; 9():164-78. PubMed ID: 26312078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study.
    Lorentsson R; Hosseini N; Johansson JO; Rosenberg W; Stenborg B; Månsson LG; Båth M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 29322614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phantom evaluation of stacked-type dual-frequency 1-3 composite transducers: A feasibility study on intracavitary acoustic angiography.
    Kim J; Li S; Kasoji S; Dayton PA; Jiang X
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Dec; 63():7-15. PubMed ID: 26112426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.