121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12841854)
1. Estimating the cumulative risk of false positive cancer screenings.
Baker SG; Erwin D; Kramer BS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jul; 3():11. PubMed ID: 12841854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Thoresen S; Tretli S
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(7):1501-7. PubMed ID: 15378474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive under a regimen involving various types of cancer screening tests.
Baker SG; Kramer BS
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18416950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the age to begin periodic breast cancer screening using data from a few regularly scheduled screenings.
Baker SG
Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1569-78. PubMed ID: 9883553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive test in a repeated screening program.
Xu JL; Fagerstrom RM; Prorok PC; Kramer BS
Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):651-60. PubMed ID: 15339287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on long-term adherence to breast cancer screening.
Román R; Sala M; De La Vega M; Natal C; Galceran J; González-Román I; Baroja A; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Castells X
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 21617920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases.
Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Delafosse P; Poncet F; Colonna M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 May; 127(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 20809364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17626709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women by hormone receptor status.
Chlebowski RT; Anderson GL; Lane DS; Aragaki AK; Rohan T; Yasmeen S; Sarto G; Rosenberg CA; Hubbell FA;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1695-705. PubMed ID: 18000216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.
Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's anxieties caused by false positives in mammography screening: a contingent valuation survey.
Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jan; 101(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16821083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of observed and expected numbers of detected cancers in the research center for cancer prevention and screening program.
Hamashima C; Sobue T; Muramatsu Y; Saito H; Moriyama N; Kakizoe T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 May; 36(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 16735372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Who receives, benefits from and is harmed by cervical and breast cancer screening among Hong Kong Chinese?
Leung GM; Woo PP; Cowling BJ; Tsang CS; Cheung AN; Ngan HY; Galbraith K; Lam TH
J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Sep; 30(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 18482996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial.
Stojadinovic A; Nissan A; Gallimidi Z; Lenington S; Logan W; Zuley M; Yeshaya A; Shimonov M; Melloul M; Fields S; Allweis T; Ginor R; Gur D; Shriver CD
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Apr; 23(12):2703-15. PubMed ID: 15837985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast carcinoma screening and risk perception among women at increased risk for breast carcinoma: results from a national survey.
Sabatino SA; Burns RB; Davis RB; Phillips RS; Chen YH; McCarthy EP
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2338-46. PubMed ID: 15160336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective study of electrical impedance scanning for identifying young women at risk for breast cancer.
Stojadinovic A; Moskovitz O; Gallimidi Z; Fields S; Brooks AD; Brem R; Mucciola RN; Singh M; Maniscalco-Theberge M; Rockette HE; Gur D; Shriver CD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 May; 97(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16491309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
