297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12842753)
1. Intravenous catheter training system: computer-based education versus traditional learning methods.
Engum SA; Jeffries P; Fisher L
Am J Surg; 2003 Jul; 186(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 12842753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technology-based vs. traditional instruction. A comparison of two methods for teaching the skill of performing a 12-lead ECG.
Jeffries PR; Woolf S; Linde B
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2003; 24(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 12743975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer versus lecture: a comparison of two methods of teaching oral medication administration in a nursing skills laboratory.
Jeffries PR
J Nurs Educ; 2001 Oct; 40(7):323-9. PubMed ID: 11596685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: a randomised controlled trial.
Bloomfield J; Roberts J; While A
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 19762016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement.
Prystowsky JB; Regehr G; Rogers DA; Loan JP; Hiemenz LL; Smith KM
Am J Surg; 1999 Feb; 177(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 10204565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the effectiveness of the virtual simulator and video-assisted teaching on intravenous catheter insertion skills and self-confidence: A quasi-experimental study.
İsmailoğlu EG; Orkun N; Eşer İ; Zaybak A
Nurse Educ Today; 2020 Dec; 95():104596. PubMed ID: 33002745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Teaching intravenous cannulation to medical students: comparative analysis of two simulators and two traditional educational approaches.
Bowyer MW; Pimentel EA; Fellows JB; Scofield RL; Ackerman VL; Horne PE; Liu AV; Schwartz GR; Scerbo MW
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():57-63. PubMed ID: 15718699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning nursing procedures: the influence of simulator fidelity and student gender on teaching effectiveness.
Grady JL; Kehrer RG; Trusty CE; Entin EB; Entin EE; Brunye TT
J Nurs Educ; 2008 Sep; 47(9):403-8. PubMed ID: 18792707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Creation and Global Deployment of a Mobile, Application-Based Cognitive Simulator for Cardiac Surgical Procedures.
Brewer ZE; Ogden WD; Fann JI; Burdon TA; Sheikh AY
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016; 28(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27568126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.
Gega L; Norman IJ; Marks IM
Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Mar; 44(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 16631177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relevance of low-fidelity virtual reality simulators compared with other learning methods in basic endovascular skills training.
Aeckersberg G; Gkremoutis A; Schmitz-Rixen T; Kaiser E
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 69(1):227-235. PubMed ID: 30579447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Virtual Simulator With a Plastic Arm Model in Teaching Intravenous Catheter Insertion Skills.
Günay İsmailoğlu E; Zaybak A
Comput Inform Nurs; 2018 Feb; 36(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 29176359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an interactive web-based nursing course with streaming videos for medication administration skills.
Sowan AK; Idhail JA
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 83(8):592-600. PubMed ID: 24930589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial.
Schoeb DS; Schwarz J; Hein S; Schlager D; Pohlmann PF; Frankenschmidt A; Gratzke C; Miernik A
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 20(1):510. PubMed ID: 33327963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Artificial Intelligence Tutoring vs Expert Instruction on Learning Simulated Surgical Skills Among Medical Students: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Fazlollahi AM; Bakhaidar M; Alsayegh A; Yilmaz R; Winkler-Schwartz A; Mirchi N; Langleben I; Ledwos N; Sabbagh AJ; Bajunaid K; Harley JM; Del Maestro RF
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Feb; 5(2):e2149008. PubMed ID: 35191972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual reality in nursing education 3D intravenous catheterization E-learning: A randomized controlled trial.
Yildiz H; Demiray A
Contemp Nurse; 2022; 58(2-3):125-137. PubMed ID: 35262461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of a computerized male urethral catheterization simulator.
Jöud A; Sandholm A; Alseby L; Petersson G; Nilsson G
Nurse Educ Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 19443272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A virtual surgery in general practice: evaluation of a novel undergraduate virtual patient learning package.
Gormley GJ; McGlade K; Thomson C; McGill M; Sun J
Med Teach; 2011; 33(10):e522-7. PubMed ID: 21942488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
