157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12843035)
1. Reliability of nucleic acid amplification methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine: results of the first international collaborative quality control study among 96 laboratories.
Verkooyen RP; Noordhoek GT; Klapper PE; Reid J; Schirm J; Cleator GM; Ieven M; Hoddevik G
J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 41(7):3013-6. PubMed ID: 12843035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.
Land S; Tabrizi S; Gust A; Johnson E; Garland S; Dax EM
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2893-6. PubMed ID: 12149347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.
Pasternack R; Vuorinen P; Pitkäjärvi T; Koskela M; Miettinen A
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 35(2):402-5. PubMed ID: 9003605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised.
Schachter J; Chow JM; Howard H; Bolan G; Moncada J
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2512-7. PubMed ID: 16825373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.
Goessens WH; Mouton JW; van der Meijden WI; Deelen S; van Rijsoort-Vos TH; Lemmens-den Toom N; Verbrugh HA; Verkooyen RP
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Oct; 35(10):2628-33. PubMed ID: 9316920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a transcription-mediated amplification assay and polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.
Pasternack R; Vuorinen P; Miettinen A
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Feb; 18(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 10219580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance characteristics of the Becton Dickinson ProbeTec System for direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in male and female urine specimens in comparison with the Roche Cobas System.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Olienus K; Antonishyn N; Horsman GB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Nov; 124(11):1649-52. PubMed ID: 11079018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Gen-probe transcription-mediated amplification, Abbott PCR, and Roche PCR assays for detection of wild-type and mutant plasmid strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden.
Møller JK; Pedersen LN; Persson K
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 46(12):3892-5. PubMed ID: 18842934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs.
Van Der Pol B; Ferrero DV; Buck-Barrington L; Hook E; Lenderman C; Quinn T; Gaydos CA; Lovchik J; Schachter J; Moncada J; Hall G; Tuohy MJ; Jones RB
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):1008-16. PubMed ID: 11230419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Abbott LCx ligase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine and genital swab specimens from a sexually transmitted disease clinic population.
Carroll KC; Aldeen WE; Morrison M; Anderson R; Lee D; Mottice S
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1630-3. PubMed ID: 9620391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens.
Gaydos CA; Theodore M; Dalesio N; Wood BJ; Quinn TC
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):3041-5. PubMed ID: 15243057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by DNA amplification methods in urine samples from men with urethritis.
Templeton K; Roberts J; Jeffries D; Forster G; Aitken C
Int J STD AIDS; 2001 Dec; 12(12):793-6. PubMed ID: 11779369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can the Swedish new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis (nvCT) be detected by UK NEQAS participants from seventeen European countries and five additional countries/regions in 2009?
Unemo M; Rossouw A; James V; Jenkins C
Euro Surveill; 2009 May; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 19442398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal inhibitory effect of male urine on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by Roche Amplicor PCR.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Antonishyn N; Horsman GB
J Med Microbiol; 1999 Feb; 48(2):215-218. PubMed ID: 9989651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Puolakkainen M; Hiltunen-Back E; Reunala T; Suhonen S; Lähteenmäki P; Lehtinen M; Paavonen J
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1489-93. PubMed ID: 9620366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Roche Cobas Amplicor and Abbott LCx for the rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from high-risk patients.
Steingrímsson O; Jónsdóttir K; Olafsson JH; Karlsson SM; Pálsdóttir R; Davídsson S
Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Jan; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9437784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of results obtained by performing a second ligase chain reaction assay and PCR analysis on urine samples with positive or near-cutoff results in the LCx test for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Castriciano S; Luinstra K; Jang D; Patel J; Mahony J; Kapala J; Chernesky M
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Jul; 40(7):2632-4. PubMed ID: 12089293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Becton Dickinson strand displacement amplification and Cobas Amplicor Roche PCR for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: pooling versus individual tests.
Bang D; Angelsø L; Schirakow B; Westh H
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2003 Oct; 9(10):1020-3. PubMed ID: 14616744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the BD ProbeTec™ Chlamydia trachomatis Qx amplified DNA assay on the BD Viper™ system with XTR™ technology.
Taylor SN; Van Der Pol B; Lillis R; Hook EW; Lebar W; Davis T; Fuller D; Mena L; Fine P; Gaydos CA; Martin DH
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jul; 38(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 21301389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
