These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12843444)

  • 1. Subtraction-hybridization method for the identification of imprinted genes.
    Ishino F; Kuroiwa Y; Miyoshi N; Kobayashi S; Kohda T; Kaneko-Ishino T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2001; 181():101-12. PubMed ID: 12843444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peg1/Mest imprinted gene on chromosome 6 identified by cDNA subtraction hybridization.
    Kaneko-Ishino T; Kuroiwa Y; Miyoshi N; Kohda T; Suzuki R; Yokoyama M; Viville S; Barton SC; Ishino F; Surani MA
    Nat Genet; 1995 Sep; 11(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 7550314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monoallelic expression of nine imprinted genes in the sheep embryo occurs after the blastocyst stage.
    Thurston A; Taylor J; Gardner J; Sinclair KD; Young LE
    Reproduction; 2008 Jan; 135(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 18159081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expression profiling of uniparental mouse embryos is inefficient in identifying novel imprinted genes.
    Ruf N; Dünzinger U; Brinckmann A; Haaf T; Nürnberg P; Zechner U
    Genomics; 2006 Apr; 87(4):509-19. PubMed ID: 16455231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disruption of parental-specific expression of imprinted genes in uniparental fetuses.
    Ogawa H; Wu Q; Komiyama J; Obata Y; Kono T
    FEBS Lett; 2006 Oct; 580(22):5377-84. PubMed ID: 16987518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A novel method of subtraction cDNA hybridization allowing cloning of genes showing differential expression in cell micropopulations].
    Vasil'ev OL; Luk'ianov SA; Beliavskiĭ AV; Kazanskaia OV; Zaraĭskiĭ AG
    Bioorg Khim; 1996 Dec; 22(12):894-9. PubMed ID: 9054339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential subtraction display: a unified approach for isolation of cDNAs from differentially expressed genes.
    Pardinas JR; Combates NJ; Prouty SM; Stenn KS; Parimoo S
    Anal Biochem; 1998 Mar; 257(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 9514785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suppression subtractive hybridization.
    Rebrikov DV; Desai SM; Siebert PD; Lukyanov SA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 258():107-34. PubMed ID: 14970460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of imprinted loci by methylation: use of methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis (Me-RDA).
    Smith RJ; Kelsey G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2001; 181():113-32. PubMed ID: 12843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic imprinting of IGF2, p57(KIP2) and PEG1/MEST in a marsupial, the tammar wallaby.
    Suzuki S; Renfree MB; Pask AJ; Shaw G; Kobayashi S; Kohda T; Kaneko-Ishino T; Ishino F
    Mech Dev; 2005 Feb; 122(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15652708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of the mouse paternally expressed imprinted gene Zdbf2 on chromosome 1 and its imprinted human homolog ZDBF2 on chromosome 2.
    Kobayashi H; Yamada K; Morita S; Hiura H; Fukuda A; Kagami M; Ogata T; Hata K; Sotomaru Y; Kono T
    Genomics; 2009 May; 93(5):461-72. PubMed ID: 19200453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activation of paternally expressed imprinted genes in newly derived germline-competent mouse parthenogenetic embryonic stem cell lines.
    Jiang H; Sun B; Wang W; Zhang Z; Gao F; Shi G; Cui B; Kong X; He Z; Ding X; Kuang Y; Fei J; Sun YJ; Feng Y; Jin Y
    Cell Res; 2007 Sep; 17(9):792-803. PubMed ID: 17768400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bisulfite-based methylation analysis of imprinted genes.
    Engemann S; El-Maarri O; Hajkova P; Oswald J; Walter J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2001; 181():217-28. PubMed ID: 12843453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asb4, Ata3, and Dcn are novel imprinted genes identified by high-throughput screening using RIKEN cDNA microarray.
    Mizuno Y; Sotomaru Y; Katsuzawa Y; Kono T; Meguro M; Oshimura M; Kawai J; Tomaru Y; Kiyosawa H; Nikaido I; Amanuma H; Hayashizaki Y; Okazaki Y
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2002 Feb; 290(5):1499-505. PubMed ID: 11820791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balanced translocations for the analysis of imprinted regions of the mouse genome.
    Ferguson-Smith AC; Tevendale M; Georgiades P; Grandjean V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2001; 181():41-54. PubMed ID: 12843440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imprinted status of pleomorphic adenoma gene-like I and paternal expression gene 10 genes in pigs.
    Zhang FW; Cheng HC; Jiang CD; Deng CY; Xiong YZ; Li FE; Lei MG
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):886-90. PubMed ID: 17178803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic imprinting: cis-acting sequences and regional control.
    Reinhart B; Chaillet JR
    Int Rev Cytol; 2005; 243():173-213. PubMed ID: 15797460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diploid parthenogenetic embryos adopt a maternal-type methylation pattern on both sets of maternal chromosomes.
    Liu JH; Zhu JQ; Liang XW; Yin S; Ola SI; Hou Y; Chen DY; Schatten H; Sun QY
    Genomics; 2008 Feb; 91(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18036775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification and quantification of differentially expressed transcripts in in vitro-produced bovine preimplantation stage embryos.
    Tesfaye D; Ponsuksili S; Wimmers K; Gilles M; Schellander K
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2003 Oct; 66(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 12950097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is it genomic imprinting or preferential expression?
    Khatib H
    Bioessays; 2007 Oct; 29(10):1022-8. PubMed ID: 17876793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.