218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12843762)
1. Geocoding addresses from a large population-based study: lessons learned.
McElroy JA; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert SA; Newcomb PA
Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12843762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Post office box addresses: a challenge for geographic information system-based studies.
Hurley SE; Saunders TM; Nivas R; Hertz A; Reynolds P
Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 12843760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.
Schootman M; Sterling DA; Struthers J; Yan Y; Laboube T; Emo B; Higgs G
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17448683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of geographic information systems in birth defects surveillance and research.
Siffel C; Strickland MJ; Gardner BR; Kirby RS; Correa A
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 17094141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the intensity of a spatial point process from locations coarsened by incomplete geocoding.
Zimmerman DL
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):262-70. PubMed ID: 17680833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating impacts of positional error on potential health care accessibility.
Bell S; Wilson K; Shah TI; Gersher S; Elliott T
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 22469488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving geocoding practices: evaluation of geocoding tools.
Yang DH; Bilaver LM; Hayes O; Goerge R
J Med Syst; 2004 Aug; 28(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15366241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of address coding and the effects of coding errors.
Kravets N; Hadden WC
Health Place; 2007 Mar; 13(1):293-8. PubMed ID: 16162420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geocoding in cancer research: a review.
Rushton G; Armstrong MP; Gittler J; Greene BR; Pavlik CE; West MM; Zimmerman DL
Am J Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 30(2 Suppl):S16-24. PubMed ID: 16458786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving geocoding outcomes for the Nebraska Cancer Registry: learning from proven practices.
Lin G; Gray J; Qu M
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 21086822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial clustering of the failure to geocode and its implications for the detection of disease clustering.
Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4254-66. PubMed ID: 18407570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancer incidence in municipalities near two former nuclear materials processing facilities in Pennsylvania--an update.
Boice JD; Bigbee WL; Mumma MT; Heath CW; Blot WJ
Health Phys; 2009 Feb; 96(2):118-27. PubMed ID: 19131733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
