BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12843762)

  • 41. Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.
    Dilekli N; Janitz A; Campbell J
    J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32833379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.
    Embi PJ; Desai S; Cooney TG
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e22. PubMed ID: 14517113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Spatial implications associated with using Euclidean distance measurements and geographic centroid imputation in health care research.
    Jones SG; Ashby AJ; Momin SR; Naidoo A
    Health Serv Res; 2010 Feb; 45(1):316-27. PubMed ID: 19780852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing the Certainty of Locations Produced by an Address Geocoding System.
    Davis CA; Fonseca FT
    Geoinformatica; 2007; 11(1):103-129. PubMed ID: 32214874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A multi-stage approach to maximizing geocoding success in a large population-based cohort study through automated and interactive processes.
    Sonderman JS; Mumma MT; Cohen SS; Cope EL; Blot WJ; Signorello LB
    Geospat Health; 2012 May; 6(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 22639129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluating geographic imputation approaches for zip code level data: an application to a study of pediatric diabetes.
    Hibbert JD; Liese AD; Lawson A; Porter DE; Puett RC; Standiford D; Liu L; Dabelea D
    Int J Health Geogr; 2009 Oct; 8():54. PubMed ID: 19814809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of residential geocoding methods in population-based study of air quality and birth defects.
    Gilboa SM; Mendola P; Olshan AF; Harness C; Loomis D; Langlois PH; Savitz DA; Herring AH
    Environ Res; 2006 Jun; 101(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 16483563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Methods for retrospective geocoding in population studies: the Jackson Heart Study.
    Robinson JC; Wyatt SB; Hickson D; Gwinn D; Faruque F; Sims M; Sarpong D; Taylor HA
    J Urban Health; 2010 Jan; 87(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 20187277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The development and evaluation of a PDA-based method for public health surveillance data collection in developing countries.
    Yu P; de Courten M; Pan E; Galea G; Pryor J
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Aug; 78(8):532-42. PubMed ID: 19369114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
    Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Geographic Information System mapping as a tool to assess nonresponse bias in survey research.
    Hansen RA; Henley AC; Brouwer ES; Oraefo AN; Roth MT
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Sep; 3(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 17945157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Risk of breast cancer for women living in rural areas from adult exposure to atrazine from well water in Wisconsin.
    McElroy JA; Gangnon RE; Newcomb PA; Kanarek MS; Anderson HA; Brook JV; Trentham-Dietz A; Remington PL
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 17(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 16823399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of the response of a questionnaire study by using the GIS and standard statistical methods.
    Slachtová H; Machová T; Tomásková H; Michalík J
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2003 Jun; 11(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 12884550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Development and application of geographic information system of Aedes vector in Chaozhou city, Guangdong province].
    Yi BT; Xu DZ; Zhang ZY; Zhang B; Xi YZ; Fu JG; Luo J; Yuan MH; Liu SQ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 25(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 15132867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
    Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Error and bias in determining exposure potential of children at school locations using proximity-based GIS techniques.
    Zandbergen PA; Green JW
    Environ Health Perspect; 2007 Sep; 115(9):1363-70. PubMed ID: 17805429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A river water quality model integrated with a web-based geographic information system.
    Wang X; Homer M; Dyer SD; White-Hull C; Du C
    J Environ Manage; 2005 May; 75(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 15829364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. New methods to identify and rank high pedestrian crash zones: an illustration.
    Pulugurtha SS; Krishnakumar VK; Nambisan SS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jul; 39(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 17227666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Geocoding health data with Geographic Information Systems: a pilot study in northeast Italy for developing a standardized data-acquiring format.
    Baldovin T; Zangrando D; Casale P; Ferrarese F; Bertoncello C; Buja A; Marcolongo A; Baldo V
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2015 Aug; 56(2):E88-94. PubMed ID: 26789994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.