These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12843762)

  • 61. Zip code caveat: bias due to spatiotemporal mismatches between zip codes and US census-defined geographic areas--the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.
    Krieger N; Waterman P; Chen JT; Soobader MJ; Subramanian SV; Carson R
    Am J Public Health; 2002 Jul; 92(7):1100-2. PubMed ID: 12084688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. On the use of ZIP codes and ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) for the spatial analysis of epidemiological data.
    Grubesic TH; Matisziw TC
    Int J Health Geogr; 2006 Dec; 5():58. PubMed ID: 17166283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Place, space, and health: GIS and epidemiology.
    Krieger N
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):384-5. PubMed ID: 12843759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Impacts of geocoding quality in environmental epidemiology studies: two case-studies in Tuscany Region (Central Italy)].
    Nuvolone D; Santini M; Pepe P; Cipriani F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 26951701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Comparison of Google and Yahoo applications for geocoding of postal addresses in epidemiological studies].
    Quesada JA; Nolasco A; Moncho J
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2013; 87(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 23775108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Characterizing the neighborhood risk environment in multisite clinic-based cohort studies: A practical geocoding and data linkages protocol for protected health information.
    Nassel A; Wilson-Barthes MG; Howe CJ; Napravnik S; Mugavero MJ; Agil D; Dulin AJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278672. PubMed ID: 36580446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Assessing bias associated with geocoding of historical residence in epidemiology research.
    Han D; Bonner MR; Nie J; Freudenheim JL
    Geospat Health; 2013 May; 7(2):369-74. PubMed ID: 23733297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Using geographic information systems for exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology studies.
    Nuckols JR; Ward MH; Jarup L
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Jun; 112(9):1007-15. PubMed ID: 15198921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.
    Xu X; Hu H; Ha S; Han D
    Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):482. PubMed ID: 27903063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets.
    Zandbergen PA; Hart TC; Lenzer KE; Camponovo ME
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22469492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Spatial Errors in Automated Geocoding of Incident Locations in Australian Suicide Mortality Data.
    Torok M; Konings P; Passioura J; Chen NA; Hewett M; Phillips M; Burnett A; Shand F; Christensen H
    Epidemiology; 2021 Nov; 32(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 34310446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Geographic variability in geocoding success for West Nile virus cases in South Dakota.
    Wey CL; Griesse J; Kightlinger L; Wimberly MC
    Health Place; 2009 Dec; 15(4):1108-14. PubMed ID: 19577505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Geographic information system analysis of blastomycosis in northern Wisconsin, USA: waterways and soil.
    Baumgardner DJ; Steber D; Glazier R; Paretsky DP; Egan G; Baumgardner AM; Prigge D
    Med Mycol; 2005 Mar; 43(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 15832555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. An analysis of the process and results of manual geocode correction.
    McDonald YJ; Schwind M; Goldberg DW; Lampley A; Wheeler CM
    Geospat Health; 2017 May; 12(1):526. PubMed ID: 28555477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The effects of local street network characteristics on the positional accuracy of automated geocoding for geographic health studies.
    Zimmerman DL; Li J
    Int J Health Geogr; 2010 Feb; 9():10. PubMed ID: 20158886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Quantifying geocode location error using GIS methods.
    Strickland MJ; Siffel C; Gardner BR; Berzen AK; Correa A
    Environ Health; 2007 Apr; 6():10. PubMed ID: 17408484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A research agenda: does geocoding positional error matter in health GIS studies?
    Jacquez GM
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22469487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Reverse geocoding: concerns about patient confidentiality in the display of geospatial health data.
    Brownstein JS; Cassa CA; Kohane IS; Mandl KD
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():905. PubMed ID: 16779192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Use of Google Maps for geocoding data from the Mortality Information System in Rio de Janeiro municipality, Brazil, 2010-2012].
    Silveira IHD; Oliveira BFA; Junger WL
    Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(4):881-886. PubMed ID: 29211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Geocoding police collision report data from California: a comprehensive approach.
    Bigham JM; Rice TM; Pande S; Lee J; Park SH; Gutierrez N; Ragland DR
    Int J Health Geogr; 2009 Dec; 8():72. PubMed ID: 20040106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.