BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12843772)

  • 1. Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors.
    Phillips CV
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12843772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accounting for both random errors and systematic errors in uncertainty propagation analysis of computer models involving experimental measurements with Monte Carlo methods.
    Vasquez VR; Whiting WB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1669-81. PubMed ID: 16506991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying errors without random sampling.
    Phillips CV; LaPole LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jun; 3():9. PubMed ID: 12892568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method.
    Lo SC; Ma HW; Lo SL
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Mar; 340(1-3):23-33. PubMed ID: 15752490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of bias in estimating measurement uncertainty.
    O'Donnell GE; Hibbert DB
    Analyst; 2005 May; 130(5):721-9. PubMed ID: 15852143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncertainty analysis: an example of its application to estimating a survey proportion.
    Jurek AM; Maldonado G; Greenland S; Church TR
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jul; 61(7):650-4. PubMed ID: 17568060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18695409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data.
    Lash TL; Fink AK
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 12843771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heuristic thinking and inference from observational epidemiology.
    Lash TL
    Epidemiology; 2007 Jan; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 17149141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk.
    Vrijheid M; Deltour I; Krewski D; Sanchez M; Cardis E
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):371-84. PubMed ID: 16773122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer.
    Steenland K; Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 160(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 15286024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Receiver operating characteristic studies and measurement errors.
    Coffin M; Sukhatme S
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):823-37. PubMed ID: 9333348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confronting uncertainty and missing values in environmental value transfer as applied to species conservation.
    Akter S; Grafton RQ
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1407-17. PubMed ID: 20337683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1074-81. PubMed ID: 16709616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the value for money of changing clinical practice change: a stochastic application in diabetes care.
    Hoomans T; Abrams KR; Ament AJ; Evers SM; Severens JL
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19648827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method for estimating uncertainty arising from shared errors in exposures in epidemiological studies of nuclear workers.
    Stayner L; Vrijheid M; Cardis E; Stram DO; Deltour I; Gilbert SJ; Howe G
    Radiat Res; 2007 Dec; 168(6):757-63. PubMed ID: 18088178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative analysis of variability and uncertainty with known measurement error: methodology and case study.
    Zheng J; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2005 Jun; 25(3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16022698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
    Hossain S; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.