127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12845465)
1. Influence of size and depth on accuracy of electrical impedance scanning.
Malich A; Facius M; Anderson R; Böttcher J; Sauner D; Hansch A; Marx C; Petrovitch A; Pfleiderer S; Kaiser W
Eur Radiol; 2003 Nov; 13(11):2441-6. PubMed ID: 12845465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions.
Malich A; Böhm T; Facius M; Freessmeyer M; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Eur J Cancer; 2001 Dec; 37(18):2324-30. PubMed ID: 11720824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results.
Malich A; Fritsch T; Anderson R; Boehm T; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 11044924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions.
Fuchsjaeger MH; Flöry D; Reiner CS; Rudas M; Riedl CC; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):478-85. PubMed ID: 15973141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Utilisation of electrical impedance tomography and/or ultrasound and mammography in breast disease diagnosis: a controlled study].
Xu F; Li MX; Jusko HZ; Jiang H
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 97(18):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 28535624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic potential of targeted electrical impedance scanning in classifying suspicious breast lesions.
Wersebe A; Siegmann K; Krainick U; Fersis N; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Invest Radiol; 2002 Feb; 37(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 11799329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in the evaluation of BI-RADS III/IV/V-lesions.
Diebold T; Jacobi V; Scholz B; Hensel C; Solbach C; Kaufmann M; Viana F; Balzer J; Peters J; Vogl T
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 15649092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of lesion vascularisation on tumours detection by electrical impedance scanning at 200 Hz.
Malich A; Scholz B; Kott A; Facius M; Fischer D; Freesmeyer M
Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2007 Oct; 3(4):e33. PubMed ID: 21614295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrical impedance scanning of lymph nodes: initial clinical and technical findings.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer M; Azhari T; Werner B; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2002 Jul; 57(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 12096855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of sonographically suspicious and highly suspicious lymph nodes of the head-neck region.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Mentzel HJ; Fleck M; Boettcher J; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2002 May; 12(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 11976855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of breast electrical impedance imaging for clinically suspicious breast lesions.
Daglar G; Senol K; Yakut ZI; Yuksek YN; Tutuncu T; Tez M; Yesiltepe CH
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2016; 117(9):505-510. PubMed ID: 27677193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrical impedance scanning: a new technique in the diagnosis of lymph nodes in which malignancy is suspected on ultrasound.
Malich A; Fritsch T; Mauch C; Boehm T; Freesmeyer M; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Br J Radiol; 2001 Jan; 74(877):42-7. PubMed ID: 11227776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrical impedance scanning in breast cancer imaging: correlation with mammographic and histologic diagnosis.
Martín G; Martín R; Brieva MJ; Santamaría L
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1471-8. PubMed ID: 12042956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical impedance scanning used in addition to ultrasound for the verification of submandibular and parotid lesions: initial results.
Facius M; Malich A; Schneider G; Boehm T; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Invest Radiol; 2002 Aug; 37(8):421-7. PubMed ID: 12138357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective trial evaluating electrical impedance scanning of thyroid nodules before thyroidectomy: final results.
Nissan A; Peoples GE; Abu-Wasel B; Adair CF; Prus D; Howard RS; Lenington SG; Fields SI; Freund HR; Peretz T; Burch HB; Shriver CD; Stojadinovic A
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):843-53. PubMed ID: 18438123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of US-guided fine-needle aspiration with on-site cytopathologic evaluation in management of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Gurell DS; Tarlow MM; Salvatore M; Suhrland MJ; Kader K
Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 11293780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
