These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1284556)

  • 21. Detection of prostatic carcinoma: the role of TRUS, TRUS guided biopsy, digital rectal examination, PSA and PSA density.
    Men S; Cakar B; Conkbayir I; Hekimoglu B
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Dec; 20(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 11876539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The role of the absolute value and "density" of the prostate-specific antigen estimated echographically in the selection of patients to undergo a biopsy in suspected prostatic carcinoma. A comparison between PSA, palpation and echography in 95 patients undergoing echo-guided endorectal prostatic biopsy].
    Di Donna A; Bazzocchi M; Guerra UP; Bendini M; De Biasi F; Caminiti F; Delendi M
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):84-9. PubMed ID: 7683136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6,630 Men.
    Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; Flanigan RC; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
    J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S200-S207. PubMed ID: 28012755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer.
    Gosselaar C; Kranse R; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
    Prostate; 2008 Jun; 68(9):985-93. PubMed ID: 18409186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen.
    Lee F; Torp-Pedersen S; Littrup PJ; McLeary RD; McHugh TA; Smid AP; Stella PJ; Borlaza GS
    Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):29-32. PubMed ID: 2462262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?
    Philip J; Dutta Roy S; Ballal M; Foster CS; Javlé P
    BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):969-71. PubMed ID: 15839915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early diagnosis of prostate cancer in the Western Cape.
    Heyns CF; Naudé AM; Visser AJ; Marais DC; Stopforth HB; Nyarko JK; Stellmacher GA
    S Afr Med J; 2001 Aug; 91(8):679-84. PubMed ID: 11584784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Diagnostic algorithm based on a multivariate model to reduce the percentage of negative prostatic biopsies in patients with changed PSA or suspicious rectal palpation].
    Valer Algarabel J; Agüera Fernández L; Adot Zurbano JM; Virseda Chamorro M; Marcos Díez J; Gómez López A; Alpuente Román C
    Actas Urol Esp; 2000; 24(7):549-59. PubMed ID: 11011445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
    Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; van den Bergh RC; Wolters T; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 18406045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
    Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.
    Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; Flanigan RC; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
    J Urol; 1994 May; 151(5):1283-90. PubMed ID: 7512659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experience with an assay for prostate-specific antigen and transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Heman-Ackah CA; Festenstein JB; Hibbert P; Harvey DJ; Bunce CJ; Gelister JS
    Br J Urol; 1997 Mar; 79(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 9117228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Final results of a screening campaign for prostate cancer.
    Martín E; Luján M; Sánchez E; Herrero A; Páez A; Berenguer A
    Eur Urol; 1999 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 9933791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasound in predicting the probability of cancer.
    Drago JR; York JP
    J Surg Oncol; 1992 Mar; 49(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 1372376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prostate cancer screening at an equal access tertiary care center: its impact 10 years after the introduction of PSA.
    Soderdahl DW; Hernandez J
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 15195128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The results of a five-year early prostate cancer detection intervention. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project.
    Mettlin C; Murphy GP; Babaian RJ; Chesley A; Kane RA; Littrup PJ; Mostofi FK; Ray PS; Shanberg AM; Toi A
    Cancer; 1996 Jan; 77(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 8630923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The value of endorectal MRI in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Comet-Batlle J; Vilanova-Busquets JC; Saladié-Roig JM; Gelabert-Mas A; Barceló-Vidal C
    Eur Urol; 2003 Aug; 44(2):201-7; discussion 207-8. PubMed ID: 12875939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biopsy-proved prostate cancer in 100 consecutive men with benign digital rectal examination and elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level. Prevalence and pathologic characteristics.
    Guthman DA; Wilson TM; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H; Oesterling JE
    Urology; 1993 Aug; 42(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 7690170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Evaluation of methods of detection for prostate neoplasm].
    Zhong C; Chen M; Wan B
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2001 Jan; 23(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 11783074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.