138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12847078)
1. Enhanced frequency discrimination near the hearing loss cut-off: a consequence of central auditory plasticity induced by cochlear damage?
Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Moore BC; Collet L
Brain; 2003 Oct; 126(Pt 10):2235-45. PubMed ID: 12847078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired individuals: a review of perceptual correlates of central neural plasticity induced by cochlear damage.
Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Norena A; Veuillet E; Gabriel D; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):14-22. PubMed ID: 17658232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off.
Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Collet L
Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 16459036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local improvement in auditory frequency discrimination is associated with hearing-loss slope in subjects with cochlear damage.
Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Norena A; Collet L
Brain; 2002 Mar; 125(Pt 3):524-37. PubMed ID: 11872610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of cochlear pathology with auditory brainstem and cortical responses in cats with high frequency hearing loss.
Mount RJ; Harrison RV; Stanton SG; Nagasawa A
Scanning Microsc; 1991 Dec; 5(4):1105-12; discussion 1112-3. PubMed ID: 1822032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency discrimination in ears with and without contralateral cochlear dead regions.
Heggdal PO; Lind O; Brännström KJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):553-7. PubMed ID: 23786393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with high frequency cochlear hearing loss].
Ke XM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(5):268-70, 313. PubMed ID: 8192927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Thai-Van H; Veuillet E; Norena A; Guiraud J; Collet L
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 130(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 19845491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simple reaction times in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: is there an alteration at the edge of the loss?
Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Bonnet C; Vesson JF; Collet L
Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):454-62. PubMed ID: 17005488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of long-term cochlear hearing loss on the functional organization of central auditory pathways.
Harrison RV; Stanton SG; Nagasawa A; Ibrahim D; Mount RJ
J Otolaryngol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 8445702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of an age-related hearing loss gene (Ahl) on noise-induced hearing loss and cochlear damage from low-frequency noise.
Harding GW; Bohne BA; Vos JD
Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15925194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dead regions in the cochlea and enhancement of frequency discrimination: Effects of audiogram slope, unilateral versus bilateral loss, and hearing-aid use.
Kluk K; Moore BC
Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 222(1-2):1-15. PubMed ID: 17071031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear function in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
Balatsouras DG; Korres S; Manta P; Panousopoulou A; Vassilopoulos D
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 17106430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
Kluk K; Moore BC
Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):115-31. PubMed ID: 15668043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency hearing thresholds in children and adolescents.
Groh D; Pelanova J; Jilek M; Popelar J; Kabelka Z; Syka J
Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):90-8. PubMed ID: 16364580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The cochlea: modern physiologic insights into sensorineural hearing loss].
Frijns JH; Schoonhoven R
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(15):830-6. PubMed ID: 9623155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
