BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

723 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12847648)

  • 21. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Mesrur Halefoglu A
    Semin Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 43(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 18774032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
    Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Capps GW; Zfass AM; Baker KM
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the pancreas: a comparison of single thick-slice MR cholangiopancreatography with multiple thin-slice volume reconstruction MR cholangiopancreatography.
    Masui T; Takehara Y; Ichijo K; Naito M; Watahiki H; Kaneko M; Nozaki A; Sun Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1519-26. PubMed ID: 10584795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
    Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Non-invasive evaluation of the biliary tree with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: initial clinical experience.
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Fiocca F; Passariello R
    Ital J Gastroenterol; 1996; 28(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 8781996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality and bile duct volumetry in MR cholangiopancreatography augmented with low-dose morphine.
    Kröpil P; Erhardt A; Mehnert S; Beck A; Häussinger D; Mödder U; Blondin D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W171-5. PubMed ID: 20093569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Demonstration of normal bile duct and pancreatic duct with MR cholangiopancreatography].
    Toda J; Ueno E; Takada Y; Okawa T
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2830-5. PubMed ID: 9847605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography.
    Materne R; Van Beers BE; Gigot JF; Jamart J; Geubel A; Pringot J; Deprez P
    Endoscopy; 2000 Jan; 32(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10691265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Evaluation of a new MRI cholangiography sequence with a half-Fourier acquisition technic].
    Aubé C; Godoy JM; Vuillemin E; Burtin P; Boyer J; Caron C
    J Radiol; 1998 Dec; 79(12):1487-92. PubMed ID: 9921451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 2D thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography: does parallel imaging with sensitivity encoding improve image quality and duct visualization?
    Hosseinzadeh K; Furlan A; Almusa O
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W327-34. PubMed ID: 18492874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of images obtained with 1.0 and 1.5 Tesla units.
    Yasui M; Ito K; Koike S; Matsunaga N
    Radiat Med; 2002; 20(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 12041702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Magnetic resonance pancreatography.
    Barish M; Soto J; Ferrucci J
    Endoscopy; 1997 Aug; 29(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 9342566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Magnetic resonance study of the pancreatic duct.
    Calvo MM; Calderón A; Heras I; Durán M; Orive V; Cabriada J; Astigarraga E
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1999 Apr; 91(4):287-96. PubMed ID: 10348928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gadoxate-enhanced T 1-weighted MR cholangiography: comparison of 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
    Koelblinger C; Schima W; Weber M; Mang T; Nemec S; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Bastati N; Ba-Ssalamah A
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 19353488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Right-lobe living related liver transplantation: evaluation of a comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging protocol for assessing potential donors.
    Goyen M; Barkhausen J; Debatin JF; Kühl H; Bosk S; Testa G; Malago M; Ruehm SG
    Liver Transpl; 2002 Mar; 8(3):241-50. PubMed ID: 11910569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences.
    Cova M; Stacul F; Cester G; Ukmar M; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 14612839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children.
    Miyazaki T; Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Tsuchigame T; Takahashi M; Sera Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9423593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Free breathing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at end expiration: a new technique to expand clinical application.
    Chen JH; Chai JW; Chu WC; Chang JM; Shen WC; Lee SK
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(45):593-6. PubMed ID: 12063947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of three-dimensional negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of obstructive biliary diseases.
    Zhang ZY; Wang D; Ni JM; Yu XR; Zhang L; Wu WJ; Gong L; Hu MH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):830-7. PubMed ID: 21377820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [MR cholangiopancreatography using an open low field system of 0.2 tesla: early clinical results compared with a high field system (1.5 tesla) and ERCP].
    Wacker F; Branding G; Zimmer T; Faiss S; Wolf KJ
    Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 9465952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.