These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12848323)

  • 1. On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals.
    Schwarz W; Ischebeck A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Jun; 29(3):507-22. PubMed ID: 12848323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endogenous attention modulates automaticity of number processing.
    Avitan A; Wasserman S; Henik A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 38169041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paying attention to attention: evidence for an attentional contribution to the size congruity effect.
    Risko EF; Maloney EA; Fugelsang JA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1137-47. PubMed ID: 23709065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments.
    Ito Y; Hatta T
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Apr; 31(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 12795478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conjoint measurement of physical size and numerical magnitude: Numerals do not automatically activate their semantic meaning.
    Fitousi D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):134-144. PubMed ID: 34585319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the origin of the number-size congruency effect: Sensitivity or response bias?
    Reike D; Schwarz W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):383-388. PubMed ID: 28130715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polarity correspondence in comparative number magnitude judgments.
    Reber R; Wurtz P; Knapstad M; Lervik LV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 20382923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The laterality effect: myth or truth?
    Cohen Kadosh R
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):350-4. PubMed ID: 17548211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for different processes involved in the effects of nontemporal stimulus size and numerical digit value on duration judgments.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):13. PubMed ID: 27191941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two Attributes of Number Meaning.
    Wiemers M; Bekkering H; Lindemann O
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):253-261. PubMed ID: 28922994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-task interference effects on cross-modal numerical order and sound intensity judgments: the more the louder?
    Alards-Tomalin D; Walker AC; Nepon H; Leboe-McGowan LC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1943-1963. PubMed ID: 27442724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds.
    Hoffmann D; Hornung C; Martin R; Schiltz C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):775-91. PubMed ID: 24055929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Count me in! On the automaticity of numerosity processing.
    Naparstek S; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1053-9. PubMed ID: 20565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive processing of multidimensional stimuli in schizophrenia: formal modeling of judgment speed and content.
    Carter JR; Neufeld RW
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1999 Nov; 108(4):633-54. PubMed ID: 10609428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical order and quantity processing in number comparison.
    Turconi E; Campbell JI; Seron X
    Cognition; 2006 Jan; 98(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 16399265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congruency proportion reveals asymmetric processing of irrelevant physical and numerical dimensions in the size congruity paradigm.
    Borgmann K; Fugelsang J; Ansari D; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 21668091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What can the same-different task tell us about the development of magnitude representations?
    Defever E; Sasanguie D; Vandewaetere M; Reynvoet B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22426429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociating between cardinal and ordinal and between the value and size magnitudes of coins.
    Fitousi D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 21169585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.