These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12848327)

  • 1. Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?
    Logan GD; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Jun; 29(3):575-99. PubMed ID: 12848327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Bundesen C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Oct; 11(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 15732691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Arrington CM; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Sep; 32(6):965-78. PubMed ID: 15673184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Still clever after all these years: searching for the homunculus in explicitly cued task switching.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):978-94. PubMed ID: 17683241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?
    Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Berlucchi G
    Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 8116277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Updating sensory versus task representations during task-switching: insights from cognitive brain potentials in humans.
    Periáñez JA; Barceló F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1160-72. PubMed ID: 19350711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Location cuing and response time distributions in visual attention.
    Gottlob LR
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1293-302. PubMed ID: 15813195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal tuning characteristics of the perceptual template and endogenous cuing of spatial attention.
    Lu ZL; Jeon ST; Dosher BA
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1333-50. PubMed ID: 15066394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1250-9. PubMed ID: 17225506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1112-26. PubMed ID: 26766605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic sequential response priming and intentional response preparation in choice reaction tasks: evidence from response repetition and response cuing.
    Adam JJ; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19559396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of display type and cue format on task-cuing effects: dissociating switch cost and right-left prevalence effects.
    Proctor RW; Koch I; Vu KP; Yamaguchi M
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jul; 36(5):998-1012. PubMed ID: 18630206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cued detection with compound integration-interruption masks reveals multiple attentional mechanisms.
    Smith PL; Ellis R; Sewell DK; Wolfgang BJ
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):3. PubMed ID: 20616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural correlates of cue retrieval, task set reconfiguration, and rule mapping in the explicit cue task switching paradigm.
    Travers S; West R
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 18282198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.