These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12848327)

  • 21. Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model.
    Schmitz F; Voss A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):222-50. PubMed ID: 22060144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking.
    Francis G
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Oct; 107(4):768-85. PubMed ID: 11089406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unconscious activation of task sets.
    Reuss H; Kiesel A; Kunde W; Hommel B
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 21396830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The attentional dynamics of masked detection.
    Smith PL; Wolfgang BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):119-36. PubMed ID: 14769072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Objects and their locations in exogenous cuing.
    Schendel KL; Robertson LC; Treisman A
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):577-94. PubMed ID: 11436731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mask-dependent attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection: the psychometric function for contrast.
    Smith PL; Wolfgang BJ; Sinclair AJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1056-75. PubMed ID: 15675651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Components of task switching: a closer look at task switching and cue switching.
    Schmitz F; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():184-96. PubMed ID: 25004102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1252-68. PubMed ID: 16502846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Forstmann BU; Brass M; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 16397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
    Koch I; Lawo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    J Vis; 2003; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12678623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of response-stimulus interval manipulation and articulatory suppression on task switching.
    Saeki E; Saito S; Kawaguchi J
    Memory; 2006 Nov; 14(8):965-76. PubMed ID: 17077031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What it costs to implement a plan: plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs.
    Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 17848017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional mechanisms in simple visual detection: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.
    Liu CC; Wolfgang BJ; Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1329-45. PubMed ID: 19803640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phasic alertness and the residual task-switching cost.
    Meiran N; Chorev Z
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(2):109-24. PubMed ID: 15850158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of prime duration in masked orthographic priming depends on neighborhood distribution.
    Robert C; Mathey S
    Lang Speech; 2012 Jun; 55(Pt 2):249-62. PubMed ID: 22783634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.