These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12849798)
1. Insurance is not a magic bullet for the multiple birth problem associated with assisted reproductive technology. Reynolds MA; Schieve LA; Peterson HB Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 12849798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. To pay or not to pay. Jain T; Hornstein MD Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 12849796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. To insure or not to insure: that is the question. Frankfurter D Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 12849795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of insurance coverage on in vitro fertilization practice patterns: a complex relationship. Schlaff WD Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 12849797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology? Reynolds MA; Schieve LA; Jeng G; Peterson HB Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 12849794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Against all odds: the first state infertility mandate (Maryland). Adashi EY; Schlaff WD Fertil Steril; 2018 Oct; 110(5):824-825. PubMed ID: 30316418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Should insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization be mandated? Guzick DS N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(9):686-8. PubMed ID: 12200559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Why we should all pay for fertility treatment: an argument from ethics and policy. Johnston J; Gusmano MK Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; 43(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 23494699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving fairness in coverage decisions: an application of the Ethical Force Program's recommendations on infertility treatment. Goldberg MK Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):106-8; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. State Insurance Mandates and Multiple Birth Rates After In Vitro Fertilization. Provost MP; Thomas SM; Yeh JS; Hurd WW; Eaton JL Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 27824752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective. Martin JR; Bromer JG; Sakkas D; Patrizio P Fertil Steril; 2011 Mar; 95(3):964-9. PubMed ID: 20688327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut. Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. But is it really ART? Economic, legal, and ethical implications of infertility technology. Maher VF; Ford JW JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Dec; 1(4):17-22. PubMed ID: 10824008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Addressing the dramatic rise in multiple pregnancies. Fritz MA Hosp Pract (1995); 2000 Apr; 35(4):124-6, 129-30, 133-4. PubMed ID: 10780188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. Jain T; Harlow BL; Hornstein MD N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(9):661-6. PubMed ID: 12200554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infertility Insurance Mandates and Fertility. Schmidt L Am Econ Rev; 2005 May; 95(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 29120135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Facing reality: the Pregnancy Discrimination Act falls short for women undergoing infertility treatment. Cushing K Seton Hall Law Rev; 2010; 40(4):1697-731. PubMed ID: 21280392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Paradise lost: the high cost of infertility. Berlin B N J Med; 1998 Aug; 95(8):22-5. PubMed ID: 16018121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]