168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12849909)
1. Have DRG-based prospective payment systems influenced the number of secondary diagnoses in health care administrative data?
Serdén L; Lindqvist R; Rosén M
Health Policy; 2003 Aug; 65(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 12849909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective payment to encourage system wide quality improvement.
McNair P; Borovnicar D; Jackson T; Gillett S
Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19194336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of hospital ownership with patient transfers to outpatient care under a prospective payment system in Taiwan.
Lin HC; Xirasagar S; Kao S
Health Policy; 2004 Jul; 69(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15484603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.
Cromwell J; Drozd EM; Gage B; Maier J; Richter E; Goldman HH
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Mar; 8(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15870482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Possible influence of the prospective payment system on the assignment of discharge diagnoses for coronary heart disease.
Assaf AR; Lapane KL; McKenney JL; Carleton RA
N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(13):931-5. PubMed ID: 8361508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coding response to a case-mix measurement system based on multiple diagnoses.
Preyra C
Health Serv Res; 2004 Aug; 39(4 Pt 1):1027-45. PubMed ID: 15230940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Has DRG payment influenced the technical efficiency and productivity of diagnostic technologies in Portuguese public hospitals? An empirical analysis using parametric and non-parametric methods.
Dismuke CE; Sena V
Health Care Manag Sci; 1999 May; 2(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 10916607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the use of administrative databases to support planning activities: the case of the evaluation of neonatal case-mix in the Emilia-Romagna region using DRG and APR-DRG classification systems.
Fantini MP; Cisbani L; Manzoli L; Vertrees J; Lorenzoni L
Eur J Public Health; 2003 Jun; 13(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 12803412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital services and casemix in Western Australia.
Hendrie D; Boldy D
Aust Health Rev; 2002; 25(1):173-88. PubMed ID: 11974956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of DRG Payment in France: issues and recent developments.
Or Z
Health Policy; 2014 Aug; 117(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 24962536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Access to innovation: is there a difference in the use of expensive anticancer drugs between French hospitals?
Bonastre J; Chevalier J; Van der Laan C; Delibes M; De Pouvourville G
Health Policy; 2014 Jun; 116(2-3):162-9. PubMed ID: 24314625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How Do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes?
Dafny LS
Am Econ Rev; 2005 Dec; 95(5):1525-47. PubMed ID: 29125726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient reported quality of care before vs. after the implementation of a diagnosis related groups (DRG) classification and payment system in one Swedish county.
Ljunggren B; Sjödén PO
Scand J Caring Sci; 2001; 15(4):283-94. PubMed ID: 12453169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reimbursement of hospital services and hospital financing.
Lundbäck M; Staib D
Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 1998; 7():137-60. PubMed ID: 10538827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Severity variations within DRGs: measurement of hospital effects by use of data on significant secondary diagnoses and procedures.
Hindle D; Degeling P; van der Wel O
Aust Health Rev; 1998; 21(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 10181671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interstate comparisons of public hospital outputs using DRGs: are they fair?
Coory M; Cornes S
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Apr; 29(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 15915618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based case-mix funding system, a promising alternative for fee for service payment in China.
Zhao C; Wang C; Shen C; Wang Q
Biosci Trends; 2018 May; 12(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 29657242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Striving towards efficiency in the Greek hospitals by reviewing case mix classifications.
Polyzos NM
Health Policy; 2002 Sep; 61(3):305-28. PubMed ID: 12098523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining DRGs and per diem payments in the private sector: the Equitable Payment Model.
Hanning BW
Aust Health Rev; 2005 Feb; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 15683359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
