These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12850606)

  • 1. Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies for cesarean delivery rates.
    Bailit J; Garrett J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 102(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 12850606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability of risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates over time.
    Bailit JL; Garrett JM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 190(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 14981380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.
    Fantini MP; Stivanello E; Frammartino B; Barone AP; Fusco D; Dallolio L; Cacciari P; Perucci CA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Aug; 6():100. PubMed ID: 16911770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance.
    Aron DC; Harper DL; Shepardson LB; Rosenthal GE
    JAMA; 1998 Jun; 279(24):1968-72. PubMed ID: 9643860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk-adjusted measurement of primary cesarean sections: reliable assessment of the quality of obstetrical services.
    Pasternak DP; Pine M; Nolan K; French R
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10662103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean delivery risk adjustment for regional interhospital comparisons.
    Glantz JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 181(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 10601924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.
    Bailit JL; Dooley SL; Peaceman AN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 10362175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Bailit JL; Love TE; Dawson NV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 194(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 16458637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trial of labor after one cesarean: role of the order and number of prior vaginal births on the risk of emergency cesarean delivery and neonatal admission.
    Tan PC; Subramaniam RN; Omar SZ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 47(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 18935994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Simple Risk Adjustment for Hospital-Level Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex, Cesarean Delivery Rates and Its Implications for Public Reporting.
    Pollock BD; Carranza L; Braswell-Pickering E; Sing CM; Warner LL; Theiler RN
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2024 Jul; 50(7):500-506. PubMed ID: 38744623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
    Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
    Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: a statewide program.
    Bickell NA; Zdeb MS; Applegate MS; Roohan PJ; Sui AL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 87(5 Pt 1):664-7. PubMed ID: 8677064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Definition and adjustment of Cesarean section rates and assessments of hospital performance.
    Kritchevsky SB; Braun BI; Gross PA; Newcomb CS; Kelleher CA; Simmons BP
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Aug; 11(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 10501598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.
    McKenzie L; Stephenson PA
    Am J Public Health; 1993 Aug; 83(8):1109-12. PubMed ID: 8342718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined logistic and Bayesian modeling of cesarean section risk.
    Smith GC; Dellens M; White IR; Pell JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2029-34. PubMed ID: 15592287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.