These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12850712)

  • 1. Bone tissue and porous media: common features and differences studied by NMR relaxation.
    Fantazzini P; Brown RJ; Borgia GC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2003; 21(3-4):227-34. PubMed ID: 12850712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of 1H-NMR relaxation time distributions in L1 to L6 rat lumbar vertebrae.
    Fantazzini P; Garavaglia C; Palombarini M; Brown RJ; Giavaresi G; Giardino R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jun; 22(5):689-95. PubMed ID: 15172063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From porous media to trabecular bone relaxation analysis: spatial variation of marrow 1H relaxation time distributions detected in vitro by quasi-continuous distribution analysis.
    Fantazzini P; Garavaglia C; Guglielmi G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001; 19(3-4):477-80. PubMed ID: 11445334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bi-component T2 * analysis of bound and pore bone water fractions fails at high field strengths.
    Seifert AC; Wehrli SL; Wehrli FW
    NMR Biomed; 2015 Jul; 28(7):861-72. PubMed ID: 25981785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of Microstructural Changes on Biglycan Induced Mice Bone by Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
    Ni Q; Hua R; Holland D; Tinajero A; Han Y; Jiang JX; Wang X
    Appl Phys (Kowloon); 2021 Jun; 4(2):58-67. PubMed ID: 35479609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. T
    Enjilela R; Guo J; MacMillan B; Marica F; Afrough A; Balcom B
    J Magn Reson; 2021 May; 326():106961. PubMed ID: 33744831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous distribution analysis of marrow 1H magnetic resonance relaxation in bone.
    Fantazzini P; Garavaglia C; Guglielmi G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Feb; 19(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 11358661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitation of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: experimental studies.
    Majumdar S; Thomasson D; Shimakawa A; Genant HK
    Magn Reson Med; 1991 Nov; 22(1):111-27. PubMed ID: 1798386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pore size distributions, pore coupling, and transverse relaxation spectra of porous rocks.
    Kleinberg RL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 12(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 8170317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of experimental times in T
    Silletta EV; Velasco MI; Monti GA; Acosta RH
    J Magn Reson; 2022 Jan; 334():107112. PubMed ID: 34864390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of diffusion and susceptibility differences on T2 measurements for fluids in porous media and biological tissues.
    Borgia GC; Brown RJ; Fantazzini P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 14(7-8):731-6. PubMed ID: 8970075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined MR-relaxation and MR-cryoporometry in the study of bone microstructure.
    Fantazzini P; Viola R; Alnaimi SM; Strange JH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001; 19(3-4):481-4. PubMed ID: 11445335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of hydrophobic treatments of stone on pore water studied by continuous distribution analysis of NMR relaxation times.
    Appolonia L; Borgia GC; Bortolotti V; Brown RJ; Fantazzini P; Rezzaro G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001; 19(3-4):509-12. PubMed ID: 11445343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deformation and failure of rock samples probed by T1 and T2 relaxation.
    van der Zwaag CH; Veliyulin E; Skjetne T; Lothe AE; Holt RM; Nes OM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2003; 21(3-4):405-7. PubMed ID: 12850746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The modulation of coupled relaxation in porous media.
    Davis LA; Martínez GA; Hassoun TH; Vrubel NK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2001; 19(3-4):369-73. PubMed ID: 11445313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiscale nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion of complex liquids in bulk and confinement.
    Korb JP
    Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2018 Feb; 104():12-55. PubMed ID: 29405980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic?
    Bottomley PA; Hardy CJ; Argersinger RE; Allen-Moore G
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 3031439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 1H NMR measurements of wet/dry ratio and T1, T2 distributions in lung.
    Estilaei M; MacKay A; Roberts C; Mayo J
    J Magn Reson; 1997 Feb; 124(2):410-9. PubMed ID: 9169222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation and diffusion in the presence of internal gradients: the effect of magnetic field strength.
    Mitchell J; Chandrasekera TC; Johns ML; Gladden LF; Fordham EJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Feb; 81(2 Pt 2):026101. PubMed ID: 20365625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of historical porous building materials by the NMR-MOUSE.
    Sharma S; Casanova F; Wache W; Segre A; Blümich B
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2003; 21(3-4):249-55. PubMed ID: 12850715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.