These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12850988)

  • 21. Extraction of linguistic information from successive words during reading: evidence for spatially distributed lexical processing.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):662-77. PubMed ID: 23088508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers' eye movement patterns.
    Hautala J; Hyönä J; Aro M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1719-27. PubMed ID: 21664920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1239-49. PubMed ID: 17853202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading.
    Williams CC; Perea M; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1072-82. PubMed ID: 16846298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):805-17. PubMed ID: 19742385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 2527961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
    Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading.
    Kliegl R; Hohenstein S; Yan M; McDonald SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):581-600. PubMed ID: 22515948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Eiter BM; Radach R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):979-95. PubMed ID: 16262493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1215-27. PubMed ID: 17275060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2.
    Kliegl R; Risse S; Laubrock J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1250-5. PubMed ID: 17924820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: Evidence from Fixation Related Potentials.
    López-Peréz PJ; Dampuré J; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Barber HA
    Brain Lang; 2016 Nov; 162():29-34. PubMed ID: 27513878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J; Ducrot S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Oct; 55(4):1307-37. PubMed ID: 12420997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading.
    Zhang M; Liversedge SP; Bai X; Yan G; Zang C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):812-825. PubMed ID: 31120302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.