These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12850988)

  • 41. Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.
    Dare N; Shillcock R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 22950804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter?
    Angele B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1210-20. PubMed ID: 21553996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading.
    Binder KS; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):1162-72. PubMed ID: 10464948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing.
    Kambe G
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):279-92. PubMed ID: 15129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements.
    Ashby J; Treiman R; Kessler B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):416-24. PubMed ID: 16569156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Parafoveal magnification: visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading.
    Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 19470124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.
    Degno F; Loberg O; Zang C; Zhang M; Donnelly N; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):453-474. PubMed ID: 30335444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading.
    McDonald SA; Shillcock RC
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):801-20. PubMed ID: 15639506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effects of parafoveal word frequency and segmentation on saccade targeting during Chinese reading.
    Liu Y; Yu L; Fu L; Li W; Duan Z; Reichle ED
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1367-1376. PubMed ID: 30825096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading.
    Wei W; Li X; Pollatsek A
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():1-6. PubMed ID: 23231957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Lexical integration across saccades in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Tousman S
    Psychol Res; 1990; 52(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 2287696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Parafoveal degradation during reading reduces preview costs only when it is not perceptually distinct.
    Vasilev MR; Yates M; Prueitt E; Slattery TJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Feb; 74(2):254-276. PubMed ID: 32988313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals.
    Altarriba J; Kambe G; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):875-90. PubMed ID: 11521853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Semantic preview benefit during reading.
    Hohenstein S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):166-90. PubMed ID: 23895448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.