130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12850992)
1. Gains and losses in action memory.
Engelkamp J; Seiler KH
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):829-48. PubMed ID: 12850992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.
Engelkamp J; Seiler KH; Zimmer HD
Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 14691724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of item-specific information for the serial position curve in free recall.
Seiler KH; Engelkamp J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):954-64. PubMed ID: 14516227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
von Essen JD
Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions.
Golly-Haring C; Engelkamp J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):965-75. PubMed ID: 14516228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Free recall and organization as a function of varying relational encoding in action memory.
Engelkamp J; Zimmer HD
Psychol Res; 2002 May; 66(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 12132118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events.
Engelkamp J; Seiler KH; Zimmer HD
Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 16156173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of relational processing in memory for actions: a negative enactment effect in free recall.
Steffens MC
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):877-903. PubMed ID: 10605396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
Burns DJ; Hebert T
Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the effect of action familiarity on SPTs recall performance in Alzheimer's disease.
Lekeu F; Van der Linden M; Moonen G; Salmon E
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 24(8):1057-69. PubMed ID: 12650231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does action make you faster? A retrieval-based approach to investigating the origins of the enactment effect.
Spranger T; Schatz TR; Knopf M
Scand J Psychol; 2008 Dec; 49(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 18705671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design-effects in prospective and retrospective memory for actions.
Jahn P; Engelkamp J
Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 12629956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Memory and action: an experimental study on normal subjects and schizophrenic patients.
Daprati E; Nico D; Saimpont A; Franck N; Sirigu A
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 15707912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Memory of action events: the role of objects in memory of self- and other-performed tasks.
Hornstein SL; Mulligan NW
Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(2):199-217. PubMed ID: 11430149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrative representation of semantic and motor information underlies the enactment effect in memory for actions.
Zhang X; Wang L
Memory; 2020 Sep; 28(8):1078-1088. PubMed ID: 32892704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: a test of the outshining hypothesis.
Cousins R; Hanley JR
Memory; 1996 Jan; 4(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8821087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
